Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] selftests: KVM: set affinity of VM to right CPUs
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc:     kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        pbonzini@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20210924233037.4329-1-dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
 <YVIZ/67cfjk18mbe@google.com>
 <5b0a16a9-e98e-368f-4ecd-359c58ae34c4@oracle.com>
 <YVSoQD+yuQzlKLoM@google.com>
From:   Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <5b9629fe-0026-d693-fd76-94649fdd1ac9@oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:54:51 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.6.1
In-Reply-To: <YVSoQD+yuQzlKLoM@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: =?utf-8?B?M1RuelE1TUZXSE9HTzcvbDNiU1NBU05hc2VVY1VKY05aUHlHc3kzMHBzeWdQ?=
 =?utf-8?B?b0loWUtWcWtqUXB5QkRVbTVYZENqMmFjcjVNYWZCc0dGbUd0SkNvTGk5dS9k?=
 =?utf-8?B?cDB0d1R1eHB2RG1KR2k4Y0M3ZG5ZcGlxYTU3SXYyTW9OV1Z5U3hNMHZvY1Zp?=
 =?utf-8?B?YUFKamh1Nm9NckU1dXR2Uk94Q3JlYjI1aDQrSWsxaVkzWUkxTS9FaEc5NjdG?=
 =?utf-8?B?SHdmOVVRNEY1TmIrZnpGb1BzZCtySi92Rmt0MStMRnpWK2tkcEZOS2NBc01u?=
 =?utf-8?B?T2VIQ3QxOHR4YnBhaDMzZTdrMk92VUtKcXdHMHdNb0V5L0FrV0RpSDNJZWtq?=
 =?utf-8?B?NmZLeWxvTTdva3RBc1VmRmwzR3V1MHc4QzBydzBZQVAxbGpwSFJ4QWZ2aUw3?=
 =?utf-8?B?azZZc3lpelhuUzBqRVFFdTNKQkYxSU5vU2hqQ25TaGw4Wko1VlVMSmR6enhM?=
 =?utf-8?B?RkpxT1ZkRzVWeXMxUWRIM0ViRWRDOVFOQmpETVhPSUphQ0hqaWJ5SDVkNTNv?=
 =?utf-8?B?UTB5K3U5TzV1YnJyaW9vNDYxWVFnSXMvM205SnhQaWhoUndKbmVybGN4K1I4?=
 =?utf-8?B?bXRqR29MQ0FKNFVJTlZZOERjbFV4S3ExNWVLN2czZ1U3R0UwQ0xSUDlCR0lU?=
 =?utf-8?B?RGlHc3F4eDUvWkd4cmwwUFZGSUphTll4SnR5c2ZXZjNON0p3NklRUVhTNnky?=
 =?utf-8?B?RCtCcDVWeS8zMnBHUUhsM3BRbUZ3eEVaSVdzUTRXSEZaS2wxSVRnUjBoWmtn?=
 =?utf-8?B?TU54R1NPVExLY3F6ZXlOR1lueC9pVUR1N0R3QTV2UjErUEVpRytnSW5OeWFV?=
 =?utf-8?B?Nyt1cVU5Rmw2UjhJRXpQZnZOdHBXU3ozNHZoVFVsOXgwQy9PcEVaYzRLVzRx?=
 =?utf-8?B?VFQzYm9Hb2FCdUNZSGJrdTBaejc4dHFYSFpldmo1R0lraDlxNU8zN1Q0bURH?=
 =?utf-8?B?WkNMQVBhTlgwMzlCaGVzMUh5L01lSkhGQ296NXgyT0dsQnFWQUVFVmRNZUM3?=
 =?utf-8?B?L0lXc3VISVR5cG40YVRENnNsOTB5czFsTE9zT2lUaWRXSmE5UkpxVCtOZU16?=
 =?utf-8?B?emZLbTRTQk1tQU1ZQ1BNcGN1aklMQmtTUE91NkxDOVhYd3dKOGpITGZIby9m?=
 =?utf-8?B?TThzNkplT0g5T1I0MXhSejNRZUNIS3FYTU5NNCtGUHVpazBNQVZMWTdCRVlC?=
 =?utf-8?B?NXVJeFQvZEFjZEVuZldkbU9FOVJqWW03ZG9RK3dUc0NtOEkwMGtwQ1Q1R3Z6?=
 =?utf-8?B?OS92T0VlSU02QlZiZjJlRVBBNXlqY3lRYjUwQUZCVUxhd09iOVpEekpPM0F5?=
 =?utf-8?B?dHB3cW5ITi9LcWsrOVBKdlN5UUtVbitSQ0w0cGtDN2pmWENrdzhCdzFOYWkv?=
 =?utf-8?B?U1NIeHhCQWptd3NNaWk2YUpSTVZlV1RJNCtuU2ZQVzljOFRGN2svUm90RFJt?=
 =?utf-8?B?VGJZUHJ3ejdoZHl5RThQVWVuQ2dFUUpDOGNCaEEzN2IxZTFyOXNranY1SXpm?=
 =?utf-8?B?ZTVhclI2NGZVNk9xL3RWbnNGLy9GeDRFRWhybjcxQzhaN0hMdHAwc2lFaTcv?=
 =?utf-8?B?MEtIN0g5Vms0amhjbzlFNy94OHBFbzRLR2VLekRURmVGVThQT1NxamN1d2RB?=
 =?utf-8?B?dWRTT05aL3lnalI5RXlUUUk2VXkxTzlialVnOHdEVmJySmw1K2xlM09KY1d4?=
 =?utf-8?B?NlEyTDVWUXc1Z285U01KMVhTa2FSRGhhU01RNEhlMnRyOFRiUHJXVXRqb2Rm?=
 =?utf-8?B?YTI5NGh3VjVpTkx1NVR3azRzU21rVXQzL25xbSs1MHFaUmRHN1F3V1UvRjdy?=
 =?utf-8?B?a3VXSDZrUkJRNFV2bUdsQT09?=
X-OriginatorOrg: oracle.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 54730550-d448-40ee-4083-08d9837aa057
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BYAPR10MB2663.namprd10.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Sep 2021 18:54:55.3684
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 4e2c6054-71cb-48f1-bd6c-3a9705aca71b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: okP/W7i8Ge/1toRy3n0gL6batfGrNx98C1zLURtX7ViMKb5sx7pLpTUP5glekpel4OnZeDAJlHd4ePnH9La7YQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR10MB3000
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6300 definitions=10122 signatures=668683
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0
 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0
 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1
 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2109290109
X-Proofpoint-GUID: 2NVwd6lKnOThbeHaJpdd5ncc9ETstjRH
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 2NVwd6lKnOThbeHaJpdd5ncc9ETstjRH
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


On 9/29/21 10:54 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021, Dongli Zhang wrote:
>>
>> On 9/27/21 12:22 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> Perhaps a linked list is more suitable to here (when there are 1024 cpus and the
>> task is bound to both 1 and 1022) ... to pre-save the possible cpus in a list
>> and to only move to next cpu in the list for each iteration.
>>
>> However, I think min_cpu/max_cpu is good enough for selttests case.
> 
> Yeah, it's annoying that there's no CPU_SET_FOR_EACH so that x86 could optimize
> it to use BSF :-/
> 
>> Would you please let me know if you would like to send above with my
>> Reported-by, or if you would like me to send with your Suggested-by.
> 
> If you don't mind, I'll send a patch, I want to fiddle with the migration loop to
> see if I can make it less magical/ugly.
> 

I do not mind. Feel free to send the patch with my "Reported-by: Dongli Zhang
<dongli.zhang@oracle.com>".

Thank you very much!

Dongli Zhang