Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 30 Sep 2021 08:05:57 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
Cc:     jbaron@akamai.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] dyndbg updates for 5.15-rcX
Message-ID: <YVVTxZDkGUk7dGLp@kroah.com>
References: <20210929183735.6630-1-jim.cromie@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210929183735.6630-1-jim.cromie@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 12:37:29PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> Hi Jason, Greg,
> 
> Heres a set of "maintenance" patches distilled out of other work.  Its
> almost all tweaks to verbose output, except for 1st, which changes a
> strcmp to == because its true, and useful going forward.
> 
> Jim Cromie (6):
>   dyndbg: recode for stronger precondition
>   dyndbg: show module in vpr-info in dd-exec-queries
>   dyndbg: rationalize verbosity
>   dyndbg: use alt-quotes in vpr-infos, not those user might use
>   dyndbg: vpr-info on remove-module complete, not starting
>   dyndbg: no vpr-info on empty queries
> 
>  .../admin-guide/dynamic-debug-howto.rst       |  2 +-
>  lib/dynamic_debug.c                           | 47 ++++++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

Are these real bug fixes that have to get into 5.15-final?  They seem
like 5.16-rc1 patches instead.

thanks,

gre gk-h