Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:d5a5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gn37csp62631pxb; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:50:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzg1LRl9lcN5M/ksOE7puTKKsRKxSA0Jmu/XJOcthqTryoQRTfU7BpeLeSyozo1W3MStK2C X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:990d:: with SMTP id ka13mr5090462ejc.392.1632988202834; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:50:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1632988202; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=I/e4xOlo6/XFUsra55unByFeL3nOKsJyycT1VVieLcbQOvSPki2ceYdvrSw/saBfes 9F0crfw+dAFQCnia0wdpY0vAJ8AsFjaVjyxlo1hRIxA9piTLn9fIJLxp6kOykgHPM2Lu VMz7WHAsYZEScwxkMEbXEHD/vb/i6boDvwXm/6BUR3IfciJ6moMvxnIxvswNApotWF7y LuUdHoQUFOFwSG7PK7vr9sJc+yMfr7gzZ9A6Fw7kssPsNXJh51Q7OXxBhU7eMiAhmf9z mlqI0lrWq+/A9drivzgyirBTp7nG2QJAFNBFSoP1UIMj2nSKXNnePTbdzJZ/m0RWxQIr QHLQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:importance:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:message-id:to:from:date:dkim-signature :dkim-signature; bh=mcVKbCcSwBUudoYGAJZwo16RXU+ZQDQ9wrZUU4fk9g8=; b=L7gdxlVusBp3G/7HIG5lDOkOsrRjGMn39NN1+n06+xO7A69UDo7Dd8pn8x3+sJrRfK akJ8ue3q9bMNy3vuOlrrTXQH7d4/nE5E6qbt5mdVhaoZt+ESZfj2QL6izENXDUU3e+ez /PdQrj6PTi9WXsP+o4tgj2eyVQNiftSzCzIZaEemzxkEBLCnESi1O5tKsNiiWwFNylW3 MXvxluZJGSatjCkR3A8t2dtmK346sr3Ipp8qNA4/EM+mHe/g6U/PRDj1x+NVCLZLgojz vAin5wlPLDQJtCOB+kVZVw9I3PdkUHrfye3FlzAeH9CBW6OSEX2V0wcxVo4A3xGCkMyE TGRg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@mailbox.org header.s=mail20150812 header.b=PlVz50NX; dkim=pass header.i=@mailbox.org header.s=mail20150812 header.b=KRk5bvZ7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=mailbox.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hq30si3237753ejc.276.2021.09.30.00.49.37; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:50:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@mailbox.org header.s=mail20150812 header.b=PlVz50NX; dkim=pass header.i=@mailbox.org header.s=mail20150812 header.b=KRk5bvZ7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=mailbox.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1348812AbhI3HqS (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 30 Sep 2021 03:46:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53486 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1348701AbhI3HqS (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Sep 2021 03:46:18 -0400 Received: from mout-p-103.mailbox.org (mout-p-103.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050::465:103]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39385C06161C; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:105:465:1:3:0]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-103.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HKlcy40WXzQklR; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 09:44:34 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mailbox.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :subject:subject:message-id:from:from:date:date:received; s= mail20150812; t=1632987871; bh=0oOhnY/84xZj6hK/qrECeQA+ibgdAdY7+ 4wyOChyhlE=; b=PlVz50NXqlVhr74M+/SC8c0I7qwBxRINtuv6HNzxwSPu3HgOR I4wMMcvncB8Nw3J4pcW9yrtwTkgjCDRMn1hdFa8MQc8Qh6SL8Alk8IcrDiE9+0GH WOsGN6fslFsTeiIqiJ6qwy6WS1Z8l+IttseggERx0DeQITBlX8IGQw+6fuNDDRY0 lDoYaYYZRZ7SynFp4SQLTWvG8T1coLmAJxwlSmK2ncKU473F37dmksBSMuJBLKEo 5AIgMUptHjwOzw/2fk+rUr7IMf+RMqKSvaLLWWroAUIvzRxpsUBkN9a3Z9QpUbJs iLA/DAV404sZwCkEyxLTGUqfW9eGi/1JPsKdQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1632987872; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mcVKbCcSwBUudoYGAJZwo16RXU+ZQDQ9wrZUU4fk9g8=; b=KRk5bvZ72gexKynBoyFySR26LkfZEF7Mq0/K3WCAZ6O1ESgs9xpytdkHaoVC4ylmbHF2FW mser7shUzJi4rgN+G4RNEavdM2JM6T/2IdkxE7KN/QxTKkUqu06XRL061fBWPh410diLEJ SidKCiPD3Lukdc7/ft57HxMWUHg6Tn1exphKap5TATlVUHq1LYO2r4GbrEZDuXr9TSy+hC suLQ62vazWS48ODNK68UFaCdQ18AbcdWRk4+elbWsv5SmzX9tMk/vKxs3l/KLT2aqPftl9 AamO6H2VLjE693f+mCcXxvSAL0BnRyUo/v0lTqvUVIKbLNtV3O/pv/9EI29MCw== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 09:44:31 +0200 (CEST) From: torvic9@mailbox.org To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "paolo.valente@linaro.org" , "axboe@kernel.dk" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" Message-ID: <1624640454.149631.1632987871186@office.mailbox.org> Subject: [BUG] kernel BUG at mm/slub.c - possible BFQ issue? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9A24C26B Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, I encounter a hard freeze on both 5.14 and 5.15 when using BFQ. Unfortunately, I do not have a full error log, because the computer totally freezes and slightly corrupts the display, so it's impossible to read the entire message. However, what I could get is the following: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:379 invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] RIP: 0010:__slab_free [...] Call Trace: bfq_set_next_ioprio_data [...] bfq_put_queue bfq_insert_requests [...] This issue appears more or less randomly and it sometimes takes a little while to reproduce it (running fio helps). The call trace always contains references to BFQ, but they are not always the exact same. Once, I could see on the corrupted display the message "general protection fault". I could reproduce this issue on two computers. Not quite sure but I *think* the issue first appeared somewhere around 5.14.5 or 5.14.6, during which time BFQ only got the following commit: (88013a0c5d99) block, bfq: honor already-setup queue merges 5.13 doesn't seem to be affected AFAICS. Does anyone have an idea what is going on? I will now revert the above commit and see if that helps... Thanks, Tor