Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:d5a5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gn37csp73044pxb; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 01:08:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwArBbt2558hZ6XDMPAOTyEm1NhqLcJvDQVPxhUbTInbMvdNy+/S9zHSC5v0n3ifn9iYmkS X-Received: by 2002:a63:e10:: with SMTP id d16mr3747581pgl.438.1632989324449; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 01:08:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1632989324; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KQoYyu8PDZuNKRdKOXlNjsOShn0zfUTKjh1YS6zV5N/6zOV3KpTzv/Q5yz+M+p0aay 0V3WjCSL3XqHZN2dyvCW/9AMRuXhP/hgo48cH3HV93nHpGODXSEJAiivRW4gkaA5Rk4E HQyPabXrwonrqz3KnKjKOP+9qBpGQNW4oHlepyWsPeBRaya8QVTxqbrTn5Lc8mSvcIJc nVajp9RX53zMMzFo0ABe+x9zAENc2wVmKFgtXeImF0P7NWsUUN+s8VLI/9rFkRA6GWpO m6JlSrzKd0SDW7zMYaqmSBvu9SpHb19yttWADihhWK9ol332C09qZghx9zlL3lLuoVwM HF0A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=RxaeFRw4ZUmMiNhNsb9bEZx2hocZvptn1WcF+79ub44=; b=fwNKym1T+jHxw2uWNeccrTkw1RaSuCODxb9G+IYSzypvaUmvJJndNaVPmPERlCV7OS 98wiJXYtApj1wJrOwe2idxEoDfFhb1BWzD0BOQQJN682aBQuoRHmJ7k1cXzKaKhLFgj7 L/FuXQMPjGOBrHFOJMi2I0fdt42U+ISiKv0vYThGkfkNCr9OROMlo1cNFQ/9okDJzHAQ 7otp9hRe1PKjJG5uunpYyN5bTvYh5LyHxTyqY+Wohi9aM7euVvw/OcYmUACEpCjKnu+A C1SGTaRQpAEmcjBr0bCWIgcWog8VlTYYXvfalo9zKpEV2VrSZCpyniXHhYPFmsSH9dFt kCiA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a22si3059933pgw.118.2021.09.30.01.08.31; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 01:08:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1349064AbhI3IJF (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 30 Sep 2021 04:09:05 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:39175 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1349131AbhI3IIy (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Sep 2021 04:08:54 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10122"; a="286149407" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,335,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="286149407" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Sep 2021 01:05:01 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,335,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="476915768" Received: from rli9-dbox.sh.intel.com (HELO rli9-dbox) ([10.239.159.115]) by orsmga007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Sep 2021 01:04:59 -0700 Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 16:05:23 +0800 From: Philip Li To: Greg KH Cc: Oliver Sang , Yang Li , 0day robot , Abaci Robot , LKML , lkp@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [driver core] eedc73d4f3: BUG:kernel_reboot-without-warning_in_boot_stage Message-ID: References: <1614590004-69592-1-git-send-email-yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> <20210929150240.GB12854@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <20210930055944.GA29843@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 08:23:26AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 01:59:44PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote: > > Hi, Greg KH, > > > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 05:13:55PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 11:02:40PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Greeting, > > > > > > > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9): > > > > > > > > commit: eedc73d4f330cf7a8d18d64f327837ae9a00d003 ("[PATCH] driver core: Switch to using the new API kobj_to_dev()") > > > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Yang-Li/driver-core-Switch-to-using-the-new-API-kobj_to_dev/20210929-102216 > > > > base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 5816b3e6577eaa676ceb00a848f0fd65fe2adc29 > > > > > > There is no such commit in my tree, or anywhere else I can see, so I > > > have no idea what is happening here :( > > > > > > > this report was sent to Yang Li, who is the patch author. > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1614590004-69592-1-git-send-email-yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com/ > > > > since Yang sent the patch to you, so our Rot automatically add you in > > the Cc list. > > That patch was sent back on March 1. And was instantly rejected for the > obvious reason it was never tested :) > > Why is 0-day running on such old changes now? sorry about this Greg, that we have a storage crash in last 5 days, and the data seems not consistent after we recovered that old patches are re-scanned to be tested. We will manually check the existing data to avoid test old ones. > > And it is not obvious that this is being run on an email submission at > all, where would I have found that information in this response? I see > a git id that points to a kernel tree. No email link at all. We will improve this in our report to point out the original patch mail link whenever possible. Currently we show the git to provide the branch that we apply such mail patch for author to reproduce. But definitely, it is clearer to show explicitly that this is test against the mail patch. > > thanks, > > greg k-h