Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:d5a5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gn37csp403931pxb; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 08:29:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxCh+ALWTH+51lc1fqBty9sEXhWptB8hgus24HXa0wRBfcEikdc6Fa0cwy+a/ncpvwB+GES X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7217:: with SMTP id m23mr7384309ejk.466.1633015752086; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 08:29:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1633015752; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wUWA/GcsuQqjDSY+zhOnC1I/PoqmkU6WHPqaDLJTedkCbavVZ8Oef53UXOlwiTDvi3 ecq47eY6rKJsgsSV0RRJMbrBb91mTnW5QQZGKClZeI+vQ6tFT+IzEtqcES65amyhmiLA 4ocGOFtYpDXhlI4tjjdzlZ9xXxSXsfCJtL1tLiiCpcs+cv+WupjihYIaknFebkdIMjjk 05sCps4r/qAR7W4txxubb4dW7CWzm272qjzX84HhhOu68mZc2bUy//JfrO9Q/8G8ckfx xlkj+h1MrcFqV60eD56b2A8GgCXO0DfUFHLWn+2+RL1nJP52W3C8GW8yeXK/RxU67KzT gh1A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=B7h5y8PD/7Nc5omXfvnGeRUg8C8EvBAnSJGeV7djTY0=; b=wOmKLeHPwmhtQdHIjBn+JakRW7GM1cy+36yN1C2joddJArpLnzpl81r6PQrLXnNxq+ BjO9Q/Q0WJRTThh3lbJJ4g8d5klFQ5dOn0rSp9TfRgThwxll+tqtnkCJQLAoVh0mUJvn y/0D3sJEDqW+th5nsnF5+LS+QQW5Tkxq4TzgbK/lIH28j7XFlAOyBlB/1tU2Qryd22PE Vzrhmzh0mBsC7z3sJbAAFGQUXGjc7cvDl86K8fLhZ8Hv8t6AvGUeK31VxwdFxUKyLG8m /naP9KVjPBdxGMpCPWso8Lf0Nr/iLmk5vGo0IlD1U5GNAfoKIgsj6jke9qPBeEzwBb2e axZA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g14si658125ejb.50.2021.09.30.08.28.40; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 08:29:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1343492AbhI3PYI (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:24:08 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53240 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1343668AbhI3PYH (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:24:07 -0400 Received: from jic23-huawei (cpc108967-cmbg20-2-0-cust86.5-4.cable.virginm.net [81.101.6.87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F17E7619EE; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:22:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 16:26:18 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Andriy Tryshnivskyy Cc: jbhayana@google.com, lars@metafoo.de, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vasyl.Vavrychuk@opensynergy.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iio/scmi: Add reading "raw" attribute. Message-ID: <20210930162618.0c53ec33@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: <18401c96-a88e-c7fa-8f20-56605945891d@opensynergy.com> References: <20210922065235.12891-1-andriy.tryshnivskyy@opensynergy.com> <20210922065235.12891-2-andriy.tryshnivskyy@opensynergy.com> <20210925154310.2f31c032@jic23-huawei> <18401c96-a88e-c7fa-8f20-56605945891d@opensynergy.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >> + /* Use 32-bit value, since practically there is no need in 64 bits */ > >> + *val = (u32)readings[ch->scan_index].value; > > We should check it fits and if doesn't return an error rather than pretending all was fine. > > > What kind of error to return in the case it does not fit - ENOEXEC (Exec format error) ? That one is a bit obscure. I'd go with either -ERANGE I think as we are reflecting that the clamp to 32 bit is not representable.