Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:d5a5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gn37csp1369571pxb; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 09:12:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyQIfbgh23EAp9usILIgJkgG8lYn52nQBNvmSSAIFX22im3PlD7Rc4vDenhjor+RoMZL68L X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d1d1:: with SMTP id bs17mr6959946ejb.198.1633104742494; Fri, 01 Oct 2021 09:12:22 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1633104742; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HY3LgsLzZamgUOPdYSX0LjxLuh391UF3SFdHvL7K5KhB7aaCipfqroMKp5S6NtSUNH G1A11QBg9C9TnAE5LyKbOLZZD/K26mjoFNBYhcvd+vFGBaeyvVxmFKfuNh7OyTd/2VEz WAFCgYRQYIF41tKNVfKltxp0JPBsBXmmNOjvUfjXlagSTwaimp9oSLe07DRGF+nSK4o1 zBxlgK6WuCnpUk3cW/vweH0zT0IhnxPTIVG0jVMsJX7U9+RRNxCbOaGOKOkMiDVdnYeQ 3TTl+FOzSVSkcELdmTYq0uFjILOcPpqFF8ayr77ELEg9ZbLPhBK9TlpDLvusuKrBb1Zv p14A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=/VHZ6Yfknwx3C6XI7U1eeOS5OSKSiP3q9poIpe1X0gI=; b=f0JUoBnSBrwsN+Ol5Cz34vpEnma3vXcP1h7vu4WFWMs24ulP9GYgbeaMJLTpXykwh/ nKHlMgE+exee7ogRjFkEimybXmsLrwkDdjBHAcGKMX+K6nTFbVFd/JWLVIAEyvKUbrwa IFpq+P6ZY2jSr6gbqkwyMZJ/Ft1oT/qap11caJHKhPWYOpS4RaQdZkq/vd87XvceFtJt BvBjmnFYdfYdHhwcamN7sTtt7BkibQdvQkaq/Q2H0KOO8gbYIGWHP/o8DVo7BUGtxhqk O3NEI4N0XhKyQjMnAkwaA65hVTKnMp6tLZLBQBd1VkZj4NzKqnp01TPuHTPMyQ+p/U+q UWNw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n3si7009689edd.109.2021.10.01.09.11.57; Fri, 01 Oct 2021 09:12:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1355337AbhJAQF4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 1 Oct 2021 12:05:56 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:46678 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1355290AbhJAQFl (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2021 12:05:41 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8ECB101E; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 09:03:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from merodach.members.linode.com (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC48F3F766; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 09:03:54 -0700 (PDT) From: James Morse To: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Fenghua Yu , Reinette Chatre , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , H Peter Anvin , Babu Moger , James Morse , shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, Jamie Iles , D Scott Phillips OS , lcherian@marvell.com, bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com Subject: [PATCH v2 12/23] x86/resctrl: Abstract and use supports_mba_mbps() Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 16:02:51 +0000 Message-Id: <20211001160302.31189-13-james.morse@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20211001160302.31189-1-james.morse@arm.com> References: <20211001160302.31189-1-james.morse@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To determine whether the mba_MBps option to resctrl should be supported, resctrl tests the boot cpus' x86_vendor. This isn't portable, and needs abstracting behind a helper so this check can be part of the filesystem code that moves to /fs/. Re-use the tests set_mba_sc() does to determine if the mba_sc is supported on this system. An 'alloc_capable' test is added so that support for the controls isn't implied by the 'delay_linear' property, which is always true for MPAM. Signed-off-by: James Morse --- Changes since v1: * Capitalisation * Added MPAM example in commit message * Fixed supports_mba_mbps() logic error in rdt_parse_param() --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 19 ++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c index 069c209be1d5..1207271cce23 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c @@ -1948,17 +1948,26 @@ static void mba_sc_destroy(struct rdt_resource *r) } /* - * Enable or disable the MBA software controller - * which helps user specify bandwidth in MBps. * MBA software controller is supported only if * MBM is supported and MBA is in linear scale. */ +static bool supports_mba_mbps(void) +{ + struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_MBA].r_resctrl; + + return (is_mbm_enabled() && + r->alloc_capable && is_mba_linear()); +} + +/* + * Enable or disable the MBA software controller + * which helps user specify bandwidth in MBps. + */ static int set_mba_sc(bool mba_sc) { struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_MBA].r_resctrl; - if (!is_mbm_enabled() || !is_mba_linear() || - mba_sc == is_mba_sc(r)) + if (!supports_mba_mbps() || mba_sc == is_mba_sc(r)) return -EINVAL; r->membw.mba_sc = mba_sc; @@ -2317,7 +2326,7 @@ static int rdt_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param) ctx->enable_cdpl2 = true; return 0; case Opt_mba_mbps: - if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL) + if (!supports_mba_mbps()) return -EINVAL; ctx->enable_mba_mbps = true; return 0; -- 2.30.2