Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932480AbWLSOhT (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Dec 2006 09:37:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932453AbWLSOhT (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Dec 2006 09:37:19 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:39202 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932506AbWLSOhR (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Dec 2006 09:37:17 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 09:36:06 -0500 From: Dave Jones To: "J.H." Cc: Willy Tarreau , Matti Aarnio , Randy Dunlap , Andrew Morton , Pavel Machek , kernel list , hpa@zytor.com, webmaster@kernel.org Subject: Re: [KORG] Re: kernel.org lies about latest -mm kernel Message-ID: <20061219143606.GE25461@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , "J.H." , Willy Tarreau , Matti Aarnio , Randy Dunlap , Andrew Morton , Pavel Machek , kernel list , hpa@zytor.com, webmaster@kernel.org References: <20061214223718.GA3816@elf.ucw.cz> <20061216094421.416a271e.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20061216095702.3e6f1d1f.akpm@osdl.org> <458434B0.4090506@oracle.com> <1166297434.26330.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45858B3A.5050804@oracle.com> <20061217223730.GW10054@mea-ext.zmailer.org> <1166402576.26330.81.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061219064646.GJ24090@1wt.eu> <1166513991.26330.136.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1166513991.26330.136.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1196 Lines: 31 On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:39:51PM -0800, J.H. wrote: > I'll have to look into it - but by and large the round robining tends to > work. Specifically as I am writing this the machines are both pushing > right around 150mbps, however the load on zeus1 is 170 vs. zeus2's 4. > Also when we peak the bandwidth we do use every last kb we can get our > hands on, so doing any tunneling takes just that much bandwidth away > from the total. > > Number of Processes running > process #1 #2 > ------------------------------------ > rsync 162 69 > http 734 642 > ftp 353 190 A wild idea just occured to me. You guys are running Fedora/RHEL kernels on the kernel.org boxes iirc, which have Ingo's 'tux' httpd accelerator. It might not make the problem go away, but it could make it more bearable under high load. Or it might do absolutely squat depending on the ratio of static/dynamic content. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/