Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210930232617.6396-1-dipenp@nvidia.com> <20210930232617.6396-9-dipenp@nvidia.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210930232617.6396-9-dipenp@nvidia.com>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 4 Oct 2021 00:09:57 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaO8ydTEkPU4LT+ibzb_-5VEw9mdvMbu+R9cR6zv9MsDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 08/11] gpiolib: cdev: Add hardware timestamp clock type
To:     Dipen Patel <dipenp@nvidia.com>
Cc:     "thierry.reding@gmail.com" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-tegra <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 1:26 AM Dipen Patel <dipenp@nvidia.com> wrote:

> +       if (test_bit(FLAG_EVENT_CLOCK_HARDWARE, &line->desc->flags)) {

I don't know if it's here or a few other places as well we could sneak
in a IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HTE) to make sure the compiler will
optimize out a bunch of the HTE support code if HTE is not in use?

Just an idea, I guess it's not the most urgent.

Yours,
Linus Walleij