Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu) by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id ; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 19:58:12 -0400 Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id ; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 19:56:03 -0400 Received: from [168.143.241.209] ([168.143.241.209]:1478 "EHLO clubneon.com") by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id ; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 19:54:17 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 16:13:22 -0400 (EDT) From: clubneon To: sl@fireplug.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: RLIM_INFINITY inconsistency between archs In-Reply-To: <8lss28$v2e$1@whiskey.fireplug.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Content-Length: 1374 Lines: 36 On 28 Jul 2000, Stuart Lynne wrote: > In article , > Chris Meadors wrote: > > > >But the FHS also says you can't have things like /usr/apache. But I find > >that most useful, as deleting one directory removes all traces of the > >program. Large packages that would normally end up all over the place can > >be contained (like X, which FHS does allow to have its own place under > >/usr). > > You can do that in /opt or /usr/local if you like. Just because so many (2 or 3) people have mentioned this to me I'll reply to it shortly. The problem I have with /opt is I'm not used to it yet. I'd have to put it on it's own partition just like /usr, /home, and /var. I don't have any feeling for how big /opt should be and I usually totally just forget about it. I'm building a new system now, I'm going to attempt to make use of /opt for larger, self-contained packages. BUT /opt is going to be a symlink to /usr/local (take that FHS). At least now I'll get a little more used to using /opt. Boy, I can't think of one thing to say that'll make this relevent to the kernel. Chris Meadors (at home) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/