Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <a9af5139b6b8eb687495ffae69d32acd305ac2f3.1633351482.git.geert+renesas@glider.be>
 <CAHp75Vf-sRz2WMTa2SUfPr0LRnWYb=29WjcjB9rmV9Ty9WJ8zA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75Vf-sRz2WMTa2SUfPr0LRnWYb=29WjcjB9rmV9Ty9WJ8zA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date:   Mon, 4 Oct 2021 15:38:29 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXCJjUXA=-5YxPVhhQdBL5eNR2HJCOtB1gB2ipadFUXKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: aggregator: Wrap access to gpiochip_fwd.tmp[]
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Andy,

On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 3:23 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 3:47 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert+renesas@glider.be> wrote:
> > The tmp[] member of the gpiochip_fwd structure is used to store both the
> > temporary values bitmap and the desc pointers for operations on multiple
> > GPIOs.  As both are arrays with sizes unknown at compile-time, accessing
> > them requires offset calculations, which are currently duplicated in
> > gpio_fwd_get_multiple() and gpio_fwd_set_multiple().
> >
> > Introduce (a) accessors for both arrays and (b) a macro to calculate the
> > needed storage size.  This confines the layout of the tmp[] member into
> > a single spot, to ease maintenance.
>
> ...
>
> > +#define fwd_tmp_descs(fwd)     (void *)&(fwd)->tmp[BITS_TO_LONGS((fwd)->chip.ngpio)]
> > +
> > +#define fwd_tmp_size(ngpios)   (BITS_TO_LONGS((ngpios)) + (ngpios))
>
> ...
>
> > -       fwd = devm_kzalloc(dev, struct_size(fwd, tmp,
> > -                          BITS_TO_LONGS(ngpios) + ngpios), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +       fwd = devm_kzalloc(dev, struct_size(fwd, tmp, fwd_tmp_size(ngpios)),
> > +                          GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Shouldn't we rather use devm_bitmap_zalloc() / bitmap_free()?

That's not sufficient: the bitmap is only one part. There are one
fixed-size and two variable-size objects to allocate.
Yes, they can be allocated separately, at the expense of more
allocations, and more data (pointers) to allocate to keep track of
all those objects.

>
> >         if (!fwd)
> >                 return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds