Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933062AbWLSXOr (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:14:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933064AbWLSXOq (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:14:46 -0500 Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com ([67.18.224.114]:37380 "EHLO nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933062AbWLSXOq (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:14:46 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 25272 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:14:46 EST In-Reply-To: <20061219041254.GB6993@stusta.de> References: <20061124234935.GJ28363@stusta.de> <20061219041254.GB6993@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <3B7827F6-D6CA-481F-B6DE-0F0B2AB4F632@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: paulus@samba.org, Kumar Gala , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Roman Zippel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] powerpc: remove the broken Gemini support Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:13:29 -0600 To: Adrian Bunk X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-PopBeforeSMTPSenders: kumar-chaos@kgala.com,kumar-statements@kgala.com,kumar@kgala.com X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - kernel.crashing.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 946 Lines: 32 On Dec 18, 2006, at 10:12 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 12:49:35AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> I just saw the commit message below. >> >> There seems to have been some although unmerged work on APUS >> support by >> Roman, but I didn't find any recent work on bringing the GEMINI >> support >> back into life. >> >> Is this a wrong impression, or would a patch to remove it be OK? >> ... > > Zero feedback, patch to remove it below. > > cu > Adrian I'm good with removing GEMINI since no one seems to have raised any fuss about this and I brought the issue up over a year ago now. However, I leave the final decision up to Paul. Also, where do we stand with APUS? - k - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/