Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:d5a5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gn37csp3847927pxb; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 10:54:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwKzMNGxReULfCWdc042PjkyLY1gKp3d4uDLIGgcUWlM1UJPxXwUmJ5X8MBofYFI3yPK3M+ X-Received: by 2002:a50:cd02:: with SMTP id z2mr1615184edi.241.1633370050342; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 10:54:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1633370050; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Kfjs42OBowYgXBJr+AXpKF8a2j4J+fOG8DrWt5nlfEsYZt55FZDPt4JWLm+EoJS19D 7IHpHcTvI98ng3yJgkxXhQlOh2XjUaDP6auuybNzyPfc1BdP8JSgW/ANLPQyHh42UhZ7 hLDJ5+Y8hwsdUmQYlqdrM++sPjRxWhYWAFuofhvgTIzdbMtFqzJ+7oV/Ic3h9fE4meKz uPx7gJ804LDbZ23M+GfpdLABVS4uBQOjBnZYP77kTISYu7i6KmJ65U+kuGMPte6BIArk 9+RS5Yajt5k5q2HocgjdZnxRvZjxsxDRGJU3MKmzQj7toN98HF6kQiEqPjAkGrVuV2ZH TOtg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=zmok7DJGNyyA7oV6TEKsjzIASAjhXJvdxSESYfEt63U=; b=usmQgpmeSXIn54freiuL9/pBCVsMDbAgO2iMmQ3r8Zw+qPjumeiInPCIk8d7aoRmXd z+EnlJ86qsroWQEg6iSHRi/07SnzgWdaRRxdWEUmLKtCOGbEOgVs87tJ6yLObW8vf5Ox Fr0PPlCNqOY+OzUwDAUAXh4Tf6vN6ZnJkCgwfXrTO/PEror089HuExAsy99vjLZ3fAdc BuIcLxGYVtWASoUaTnhim4/qpkqaZDSaqKkz4YGpJ6mnNyOdTQNVzqf7RhhAWZIO7HM+ kNDefElWxKqg6VGeycw0pFJkHAUzEJWqHb/RAgz+uzo7u8TVQ2rNN9Kn+J18pKaVfF1h s9Vg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s11si21034215edh.626.2021.10.04.10.53.41; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 10:54:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235899AbhJDPrQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 4 Oct 2021 11:47:16 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:53644 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235455AbhJDPrQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Oct 2021 11:47:16 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E436FD6E; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 08:45:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.53.1] (unknown [10.57.53.1]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6701A3F70D; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 08:45:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] kasan: Extend KASAN mode kernel parameter To: Andrey Konovalov Cc: Marco Elver , Linux ARM , LKML , kasan-dev , Andrew Morton , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Dmitry Vyukov , Andrey Ryabinin , Alexander Potapenko , Evgenii Stepanov , Branislav Rankov , Lorenzo Pieralisi References: <20210913081424.48613-1-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> <20210913081424.48613-6-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> From: Vincenzo Frascino Message-ID: <3e6a5797-4690-ea54-c14b-75d6ca58e744@arm.com> Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 17:45:41 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andrey, On 10/3/21 7:16 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > Hi Vincenzo, > > Up till now, the code assumes that not having the async mode enabled > means that the sync mode is enabled. There are two callers to > kasan_async_mode_enabled(): lib/test_kasan.c and mm/kasan/report.c. > Assuming tests support will be added later, at least the second one > should be adjusted. > > Maybe we should rename kasan_async_mode_enabled() to > kasan_async_fault_possible(), make it return true for both async and > asymm modes, and use that in mm/kasan/report.c. And also add > kasan_sync_fault_possible() returning true for sync and asymm, and use > that in lib/test_kasan.c. (However, it seems that the tests don't work > with async faults right now.) > It is ok by me, I will add the changes you are mentioning in v2. > Thanks! -- Regards, Vincenzo