Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932700AbWLTAYI (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:24:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932661AbWLTAYH (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:24:07 -0500 Received: from rhun.apana.org.au ([64.62.148.172]:1736 "EHLO arnor.apana.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932700AbWLTAYF (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:24:05 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 1865 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:24:05 EST From: Herbert Xu To: shemminger@osdl.org (Stephen Hemminger) Subject: Re: Bug 7596 - Potential performance bottleneck for Linxu TCP Cc: mingo@elte.hu, akpm@osdl.org, wenji@fnal.gov, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Organization: Core In-Reply-To: <20061219103756.38f7426c@freekitty> X-Newsgroups: apana.lists.os.linux.kernel,apana.lists.os.linux.netdev User-Agent: tin/1.7.4-20040225 ("Benbecula") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.17-rc4 (i686)) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:52:19 +1100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 789 Lines: 19 Stephen Hemminger wrote: > I noticed this bit of discussion in tcp_recvmsg. It implies that a better > queuing policy would be good. But it is confusing English (Alexey?) so > not sure where to start. Actually I think the comment says that the current code isn't the most elegant but is more efficient. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/