Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210726231351.655302-1-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
 <CAD=FV=UGtHXD==Yy8CVCOioYGb=2hqGQOoNWftD1Jj7OiEp51g@mail.gmail.com> <YVd3YdfgFVc0Br5T@ripper>
In-Reply-To: <YVd3YdfgFVc0Br5T@ripper>
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Date:   Mon, 4 Oct 2021 17:36:10 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=U=xVLuKOYHbGPTkLjGa8_U+F1ZtEvJt4LGaRuR5SsKFw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] drm/msm/dp: Allow attaching a drm_panel
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc:     Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
        Kuogee Hsieh <khsieh@codeaurora.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        Vara Reddy <varar@codeaurora.org>,
        freedreno <freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        Chandan Uddaraju <chandanu@codeaurora.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 2:00 PM Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri 27 Aug 13:52 PDT 2021, Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 4:15 PM Bjorn Andersson
> > <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > +static int dp_parser_find_panel(struct dp_parser *parser)
> > > +{
> > > +       struct device_node *np = parser->pdev->dev.of_node;
> > > +       int rc;
> > > +
> > > +       rc = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(np, 2, 0, &parser->drm_panel, NULL);
> >
> > Why port 2? Shouldn't this just be port 1 always? The yaml says that
> > port 1 is "Output endpoint of the controller". We should just use port
> > 1 here, right?
> >
>
> Finally got back to this, changed it to 1 and figured out why I left it
> at 2.
>
> drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge() on a DP controller will find the of_graph
> reference to the USB-C controller, scan through the registered panels
> and conclude that the of_node of the USB-C controller isn't a registered
> panel and return -EPROBE_DEFER.

I'm confused, but maybe it would help if I could see something
concrete. Is there a specific board this was happening on?

Under the DP node in the device tree I expect:

ports {
  port@1 {
    reg = <1>;
    edp_out: endpoint {
      remote-endpoint = <&edp_panel_in>;
    };
  };
};

If you have "port@1" pointing to a USB-C controller but this instance
of the DP controller is actually hooked up straight to a panel then
you should simply delete the "port@1" that points to the typeC and
replace it with one that points to a panel, right?

-Doug