Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:d5a5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gn37csp4345664pxb; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 00:42:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYYYjGKGjbPfKqW3+rOVBH6TqZsPYZlhU1G+KZZRnYjBdOhv2Yhqyj4/WcP+mUgA2+Q5WG X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3f9a:: with SMTP id hr26mr22548581ejc.438.1633419733821; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 00:42:13 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1633419733; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hinoXVQx44KugBvCgpPBnI7ubYmiCCQs6esXGn2Sl+cFKmqmb9BnHYV+lxceiKWTBJ +1s5nICaCRNl5CS4G+tsIbtA/vT0qv1ATNNYdWxhpCA3Q/e9JghNmpynCHiVsDgzWepi 77NEmTn5byETkbjyfUMT+82UrpWvTKUQsTJPVBkvL/Y6B0Ri2Lrb4rhP8zXtYANV6tFq VLuRvN8pNjbiwea4VbzYN6dm7lJI0xU4M7WRD2oPcZWungHAPBe+AxKjeF5Is7nNyyUZ BXe84TgJzBaNNzx2PGAawvYrBstlPsLx0aRVtP+iIM/hPw7u9dSLJ2OH0p0TIo73Uf9Y cXkg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent :references:organization:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=EtTBfJ7umQKOo9c4zQtEMAqccC4CaaUVFj0BPcVpmPk=; b=xzuBOaqAtRo7tZ/3bX38f6BLeWLIFPRUlTB2KAyuEfFbm4l2szp1YLSm4muj3o+bCE JJj5VMRlVdtOi6QGpUcHDmG7t0LMNQ+cDWFR3/FKmxnesRIwFFbJT5ElguWbsGuZXJnY 8t1YzE5uTeopCxXkuREKdimL7WetQ3n6isAvQgNiMhY68URqSY5zK4n6vh6z8OoU3XfW /oZMhSKebLcG/h7XrGlnmgJ50A1qmF/JM2WaGYLkKBIL3sCIEjJElBc5r939hKlOsOBx AP1150hBSi+9IGFCFxF7zLsHBC1PVkr/uH3wEDA9+3IziTYqIcjFqRsm4YDs5bBE3Rhp h0qg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=XiJlvCle; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g17si25912149ejm.399.2021.10.05.00.41.49; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 00:42:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=XiJlvCle; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232471AbhJEHkP (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 03:40:15 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:29506 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230526AbhJEHkO (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 03:40:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1633419504; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EtTBfJ7umQKOo9c4zQtEMAqccC4CaaUVFj0BPcVpmPk=; b=XiJlvClezweNM6eqgBAgka1GbG0/XUBZCiCbFpQ/qYJ9/NMvGQiXq6uYNtK5WDT7AIglRk MeBdAmWd9pn+yzlyrSydXIsYJV6fpBh3Ly9e9zJsc6/8U5gEM1jWAVrRprzRTwDBxwA1Kq +yoNxUlqZ6s8lgKxrIXFgoTIb5Ue1Ww= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-520-N9l1X2KRMuymU2ciTndIsQ-1; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 03:38:21 -0400 X-MC-Unique: N9l1X2KRMuymU2ciTndIsQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F331DA40C0; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 07:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.39.192.167]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D750F18A50; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 07:38:07 +0000 (UTC) From: Cornelia Huck To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Halil Pasic , Jason Wang , Xie Yongji , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, markver@us.ibm.com, Christian Borntraeger , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] virtio: write back features before verify In-Reply-To: <20211004160005-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Organization: Red Hat GmbH References: <87fstm47no.fsf@redhat.com> <20211002141351-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20211003070030.658fc94e.pasic@linux.ibm.com> <20211003021027-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20211003032253-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <87ee912e45.fsf@redhat.com> <20211004083455-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <878rz83lx0.fsf@redhat.com> <20211004110152-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <87zgro23r1.fsf@redhat.com> <20211004160005-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.32.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 09:38:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87r1cz2a76.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 04 2021, "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 05:45:06PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 04 2021, "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 04:27:23PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 04 2021, "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: >> >> >> >> > Do we want to also add explanation that features can be >> >> > changed until FEATURES_OK? >> >> >> >> I always considered that to be implict, as feature negotiation is not >> >> over until we have FEATURES_OK. Not sure whether we need an extra note. >> > >> > Well Halil here says once you set a feature bit you can't clear it. >> > So maybe not ... >> >> Ok, so what about something like >> >> "If FEATURES_OK is not set, the driver MAY change the set of features it >> accepts." >> >> in the device initialization section? > > Maybe "as long as". However Halil implied that some features are not > turned off properly if that happens. Halil could you pls provide > some examples? Yes, "as long as" sounds better.