Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:d5a5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gn37csp4567444pxb; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 05:59:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyirwddIAqtOT//a9r5109RzemAmBFEyTb5c1sBudXs6VN97pbGPjlgsJ2HCnqtF2keuh6U X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2d23:: with SMTP id gs35mr11739826ejc.364.1633438744010; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 05:59:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1633438744; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HaJ1CQb0yVl1HFeu4sVk/mq86L8/17FAZiJb+fVXtOHbiBjQOZf/dbLCzSoUOjSB61 0XIWImERf4WQ9BbdcS1/O0PE2dPs3DqQUssLRGAAyp1BHbjvN0KWtCy7jJuoG3W+BGlV GRi+QnEIq4u0IIKPL2fRhR9aeQupZ757OLTLN97Bwc/7l7XccAAyrh4iHbfK80ZH8SCk NGBHNvNaGmojoESLgmk4IN75GVabpzDNYPRQVd2+v3CORYsBZET8bUevEatI+wR+uDS5 eBchZ+yOFa8K9ibFK8omOyRravlXlJPJZHQyc0Az8GgEReBIJO45KAdPUmF2/dSUUyTq +WUg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=3qDoYZMzuMRzgychhmawROrxKk7RrijI3e166SN1U6k=; b=lFo9rekx9Ozx9yv5eryQAkYJJBPMbQcPUX8DkQuHukW47QHfb3EHsdueMuqrfn5MEE 37Vl4AERHieP40AC2R8wCl6Px3tCP36RbC/+ZNWhTUArwTkHcqdCvCgl7/b9o8KDjh7Q ovoY7GvlTNWOtI/3XyN8MEVo4a67aF8NvVp8912TwD71Rv/KUTrn7a2McPNpQA/DPPye fM3sB/cZG3WUh06pygVerViXc+ONENqle2ke77bLS+NRCsSvWek9WE0W/AzIpLZvb/8P yuUEp6Lc8BmGtIrr3ieoUVhakHAeSCdpjvVCszauV6eNK/p/SaSk38bzRFUOR1J8y4zY L1Jg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@lunn.ch header.s=20171124 header.b=SmBTEAah; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n15si4707321edy.392.2021.10.05.05.58.39; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 05:59:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@lunn.ch header.s=20171124 header.b=SmBTEAah; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234614AbhJEM4r (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 08:56:47 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:49724 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233762AbhJEM4q (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 08:56:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=3qDoYZMzuMRzgychhmawROrxKk7RrijI3e166SN1U6k=; b=SmBTEAahJfv2ME/hJ80IGHTdbj Jz1KnQooxxOiTxI1QJ79XKSkWHuAdOFbxsmdpL8pO6eoQqY4vegquS2pd6yUorQBfIBlPMFDP6LA8 T6qJu6v6kKG4tHXO1BAvdeB7yyWH/p3Bded0lMvkxsbr7pYfnWleTi4/Q1FyVR27IRkg=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mXjy8-009gzL-1j; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 14:54:52 +0200 Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 14:54:52 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Marcel Ziswiler Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli , Frank Rowand , Jakub Kicinski , Rob Herring , Vivien Didelot , Vladimir Oltean Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] dt-bindings: net: dsa: marvell: fix compatible in example Message-ID: References: <20211005060334.203818-1-marcel@ziswiler.com> <20211005060334.203818-2-marcel@ziswiler.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 02:48:55PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 08:03:31AM +0200, Marcel Ziswiler wrote: > > While the MV88E6390 switch chip exists, one is supposed to use a > > compatible of "marvell,mv88e6190" for it. Fix this in the given example. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler > > Fixes: a3c53be55c95 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Support multiple MDIO busses") > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn > > Hi Marcel > > Since this is a fix, it should be sent separately, and for net, not > net-next. Ah, i need to expand that comment a bit. This patch is effectively to the networking subsystem, where as the reset are for mvebu/arm-soc. They have different Maintainers. Please see: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/networking/netdev-FAQ.html Andrew