Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:d5a5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gn37csp4610024pxb; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 06:47:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxZyZrKDU8oCAHn/58ZDpbX5fX2GJQYaCrO3KqZALteeltySwFgHVENDtSnGtLIO/pdq8MT X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4482:: with SMTP id y2mr24687694ejo.484.1633441657488; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 06:47:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1633441657; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0NQVKhn/VaZ5c0nBJKTBCOkX40e2Wc/tQtjZ9wc+TGCIvaqgVmd5sN4c86jFBwB3z6 WzBKsovGn8eGBAPYT3tMqUueviy3SmCGB5q9XCmXk4rjvnOniHjR5HQwCdHm1scXfow4 wi+J4lHXl1QRyI8BhzEq/iwj9tkLtmjEZ1W8YpADBrlKUktjhVzJcImuG6QMuauqxJmL r0WNOSYhzTFT2DbjV0n/ueNAoMuMHDNjQBcmgwtAhZBVhHa7FmaigKVHL24dF9cUR1zR ASbjw6KkHfY+REzHcYa6PZOhOZtuADudO0UD67Iiwz/skX0bhCRudskb5WznN112cOTI /TdQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=MQr5JvhbeTPXIzpILBDcG4ZyoASVQMlOTqtjeshmuUA=; b=ag1UaHABxWyjv49+CJEE33ojG1MyM2yA/kiOCwYVuso0x2eLVNxHqYpCzI5axo90XP l+3R899HPPFxvddvypVYzGcGvAVXqp45pWUfX1pFVBlinr16FbEJavcgyDs5r6Q/neRO Oq4awwCpIU8Mb/cnaBb2AWrXpWQdawfenePj+ISwQvZO7kT/0fAsjjjRNhIwGnmS+UVD dcw3ESB5Nju3rj3fl2Z2J6cWUo9Lq6Qlf2FMjuY5x8rkPze9XI5JxPBDzGSpmY+Kt8X2 mKAom6uoxn2Cjb/ZxIsW2rucM7WmO5rvAdRRTBs6Uxv8kNoorfdjpUo6P4MA6VKgP5Iz qTOg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@canonical.com header.s=20210705 header.b=Sknu0kSq; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id sc28si472600ejc.599.2021.10.05.06.47.12; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 06:47:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@canonical.com header.s=20210705 header.b=Sknu0kSq; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234355AbhJENpa (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 09:45:30 -0400 Received: from smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com ([185.125.188.123]:37966 "EHLO smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233942AbhJENp3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 09:45:29 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f70.google.com (mail-ed1-f70.google.com [209.85.208.70]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D319C402CF for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 13:43:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1633441414; bh=MQr5JvhbeTPXIzpILBDcG4ZyoASVQMlOTqtjeshmuUA=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=Sknu0kSqtQX5rf0ecDGf3CxN8oOu7Re7TXRXvJrb+7Yos0py+Q6TDoX57UeJCpvVI yofsTFypeYOzhqjWsiJdsimY2ehi0vJmY/U19qX7+BQ7firQsmI0dK+/sKLNqjyB2v cty0jFNpE36hwHpwyP+kBoMwW4+bpLhqSlUB6xZpgECAKfGn66Ukf1OUIIm7PaZH0L 0HLMVcNb/3RzA7+k3oVyneOpRjG+mpBiWY+HKfcFxvughtnzpuTqLANe3m+AO2YPo4 rugdzTnHNXgIIdsKFYl3AC9GV7zXlPZAYZRyDRDWPSGS1V+gC/I9QlFf8dVvfSchKP sBRvWcFE7gmDw== Received: by mail-ed1-f70.google.com with SMTP id i7-20020a50d747000000b003db0225d219so3503477edj.0 for ; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 06:43:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MQr5JvhbeTPXIzpILBDcG4ZyoASVQMlOTqtjeshmuUA=; b=fiZShbK4UNXI/MuHIqIamtJCjSxgRKDmZVE3UZh+7N0oYfnhZI3FDWfIJAMlzQbSIM Nr57L+QKmV6imH9YIrzib5rkCIH72zjaUoO9yftaz19I/VggV9wPAsLTQ7h2i/6smmuU 34gUbo6RHcCYYjfRccu3S2WMgu9W9eAEJWCL1ciHWrr2XeIyzNnQ25FpCvOd9nREvnZa z++TsdizNN3mYWim6O/6OQZ4YnAmzE7TupEHsAW9de/B55vwj/Iw3qrszMHuA3cyKNcF bGCZi5TVDKARsW9kGSWho5DqMZey+5PJf6xq969gUMBXa0IrQT/qPe+W4RPMxG0l+NjB 8t0A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5331Hlsb8FDyzli28b6pQhY+JUF4INBMBAC4MOCFc+C/Sfds1eJK YEheIOaGG+kCNHXmZ+ju0zAuY6CSMUueftnx50CcVjGnm1tD2GObhsFThFwcq4J3oBz3tweSdyG KF+nr3iR+rtn/RIOp+8U92owRfW+6pyRkBcwLuYwaDQDAPceeoBzqSZRekw== X-Received: by 2002:a50:9b06:: with SMTP id o6mr26248167edi.284.1633441414437; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 06:43:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a50:9b06:: with SMTP id o6mr26248152edi.284.1633441414285; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 06:43:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210921053356.1705833-1-alexandre.ghiti@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: From: Alexandre Ghiti Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 15:43:23 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: mfd: da9063: Add restart notifier implementation To: Adam Thomson Cc: David Abdurachmanov , Support Opensource , Lee Jones , "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 5:11 PM Adam Thomson wrote: > > On 04 October 2021 13:05, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > > > > > Today I was looking into OpenBSD DA9063 drivers and they might be > > > > doing what you described for the reset. > > > > > > > > dev/fdt/dapmic.c > > > > > > > > [..] > > > > 241 void > > > > 242 dapmic_reset(void) > > > > 243 { > > > > 244 struct dapmic_softc *sc = dapmic_cd.cd_devs[0]; > > > > 245 uint8_t reg; > > > > 246 > > > > 247 /* Enable tick alarm wakeup with a one second interval. */ > > > > 248 reg = dapmic_reg_read(sc, ALARM_MO); > > > > 249 reg &= ~ALARM_MO_TICK_TYPE; > > > > 250 reg |= ALARM_MO_TICK_WAKE; > > > > 251 dapmic_reg_write(sc, ALARM_MO, reg); > > > > 252 > > > > 253 /* Enable tick function. */ > > > > 254 reg = dapmic_reg_read(sc, ALARM_Y); > > > > 255 reg |= ALARM_Y_TICK_ON; > > > > 256 dapmic_reg_write(sc, ALARM_Y, reg); > > > > 257 > > > > 258 /* Clear events such that we wake up again. */ > > > > 259 dapmic_reg_write(sc, EVENT_A, dapmic_reg_read(sc, EVENT_A)); > > > > 260 dapmic_reg_write(sc, CONTROL_F, CONTROL_F_SHUTDOWN); > > > > 261 } > > > > [..] > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the pointer! I have just tested this sequence from the > > > u-boot shell, it resets the board correctly. But then if we try to > > > power down the board by a long press to the corresponding button on > > > the board within 16 seconds, it resets the board: so we cannot > > > shutdown the board in the next 16 seconds that follow this sequence. > > > > > > Maybe that can be resolved by using the one-shot alarm as described by > > > Adam, I'll try to find that in the datasheet. > > > > After configuring the one-shot alarm, I still have those intempestive > > reboots if I try to power down the board by a long press within 16 > > seconds. The only thing I found in the datasheet regarding this timing > > is in case of power undervoltage, not sure how this is linked to what > > I see. > > > > @Adam Thomson Any ideas? > > Nothing immediately springs to mind. Can you confirm this is the nONKEY long > press that you're attempting here, which is resetting the board rather than > shutting down? Yes, this is the nONKEY long press that, if done within ~16sec after the board is reset using the alarm, resets the board instead of shutting it down. > > Also, would you able to again provide events and fault log when this unwanted > reset occurs, just in case there's anything there to give a clue. Can then > discuss internally to see if we can ascertain what might be happening here. FAULT_LOG = 0x60 EVENT_A = 0x12 EVENT_B to EVENT_D = 0 But I'm unsure of those values since they are the same after the reset triggered by the one-shot alarm *and* if I clear EVENT_A, the intempestive reboot does not appear! Thanks, Alex