Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:d5a5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gn37csp4635835pxb; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 07:17:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw6uyU59gA0LU9T+JPwemqufTh1Zum1q9Uj7H9llL3+wlnPRgS3+Hces1/nb86+6+8yLvg0 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ab43:b0:13e:6f69:d34d with SMTP id ij3-20020a170902ab4300b0013e6f69d34dmr5362049plb.33.1633443438022; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 07:17:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1633443438; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KT28afIIhIoa/u2eJn2ZqBxwqKnOiLTdacxdbqbP0SYhwXwfn6Mu4nvlIZO7LYytHi IL6+bs+xC0cgmEPKOJKjfkx2ZQTnqYwP6mlAELKBh9P0sxzzZ2wXtGmh9D0RXpHVLNtY VKWMyQxgglcNei+IdRL3ltrBPK2uUJMya340GGmaPPD0neCb2rA4hcCmgJJHraG77y/D RV/L1joqd9Y/Io83X/t2IkFJmQjS8nQfc8lzRE6qThg9HbIQ8M0mktH0osHY1hZYgQsO XUSmMoxXG0e+2x5+c4IueuM65UAvsayT1UjFWsJDr7Bwof+CP1m+pPhZ7ehwt9ytHoPW phUQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=eg6M9+DZHhWjU09pEauVIhFpaDJlypTGJA5u0GnBcgQ=; b=NkXOpDM2BudCfxkMrJfOK9+6lvCqeAlPVvcdNMkkb4tE0enp39F5676exHGkSr6A/d geFO7AneN2e4DsIYVNUMHxGtVR0qf03tBVL146+OSmysKB+2gAQuBz6YC9FVErWcerlN fXGQ55si2fKV/JvTvC48DrMUQFtZR6HRjls0quHc9Za0cxARUZmDsSuiCfLBuFjDHMEv 4Z4DF5EMHZhDIa2VuAwOG00P6EkttnOyLspPWex7NUou3NRTw0BvsjCQI5wVZMCTGOxC R+CgipjUOoULfeBVjgSa6danQAyly+bmz5BDc6z4XvOuQ//Tc1gWo4GnqiPn/q1Ameqw uBnA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u9si2198763pjc.37.2021.10.05.07.17.02; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 07:17:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236530AbhJEOP7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 10:15:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40934 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236546AbhJEOPJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 10:15:09 -0400 Received: from mail.aperture-lab.de (mail.aperture-lab.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:665b::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7A00C0617BE; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 07:12:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id B339041025; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:12:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:12:20 +0200 From: Linus =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=BCssing?= To: Kalle Valo , Felix Fietkau , Sujith Manoharan , ath9k-devel@qca.qualcomm.com Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , "John W . Linville" , Felix Fietkau , Simon Wunderlich , Sven Eckelmann , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ath9k: interrupt fixes on queue reset Message-ID: References: <20210914192515.9273-1-linus.luessing@c0d3.blue> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20210914192515.9273-1-linus.luessing@c0d3.blue> X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 09:25:12PM +0200, Linus Lüssing wrote: > Hi, > > The following are two patches for ath9k to fix a potential interrupt > storm (PATCH 2/3) and to fix potentially resetting the wifi chip while > its interrupts were accidentally reenabled (PATCH 3/3). > > PATCH 1/3 adds the possibility to trigger the ath9k queue reset through > the ath9k reset file in debugfs. Which was helpful to reproduce and debug > this issue and might help for future debugging. > > PATCH 2/3 and PATCH 3/3 should be applicable for stable. > > Regards, Linus > I've marked PATCH 3/3 as "rejected" in Patchwork now due to Felix's legitimate remarks. For patches 1/3 and and 2/3 I'd still like to see them merged upstream if there is no objection to those. Regars, Linus