Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 5 Oct 2021 08:47:02 -0700
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc:     Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qmp: IPQ6018 and IPQ8074
 PCIe PHY require no supply
Message-ID: <YVxzdiVKWOF9AVVV@ripper>
References: <20210929034253.24570-1-shawn.guo@linaro.org>
 <20210929034253.24570-3-shawn.guo@linaro.org>
 <YVvx9jEGS3g9LD8X@matsya>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YVvx9jEGS3g9LD8X@matsya>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon 04 Oct 23:34 PDT 2021, Vinod Koul wrote:

> On 29-09-21, 11:42, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > The qmp-phy driver suggests that 'vdda-phy-supply' and 'vdda-pll-supply'
> > are not required for IPQ6018 and IPQ8074 QMP PCIe PHY.  Update the
> > bindings to reflect it.
> > 
> > While at it, also correct the clock properies for IPQ8074 QMP PCIe PHY.
> > And as the result, 'qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy' and
> > 'qcom,ipq6018-qmp-pcie-phy' share the same clock, reset and supply
> > bindings.
> 
> Acked-By: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
> 

I think it's better if you take the two dt-bindings through your tree,
so we avoid any potential merge conflicts related to possible other
changes.

Regards,
Bjorn