Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965127AbWLTPO4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:14:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965128AbWLTPO4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:14:56 -0500 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:54009 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965127AbWLTPOz (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:14:55 -0500 Message-Id: <200612200511.kBK5BFo4019459@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Marek Wawrzyczny Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19] In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:57:45 +1100." <200612192357.45443.marekw1977@yahoo.com.au> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <200612192357.45443.marekw1977@yahoo.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1166591475_3316P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:11:15 -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3468 Lines: 81 --==_Exmh_1166591475_3316P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:57:45 +1100, Marek Wawrzyczny said: > On Sunday 17 December 2006 21:11, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Since `works with' may sound a bit too vague, something like > > `LinuxFriendly(tm)', with a happy penguin logo? > > It would be really cool to see penguin logos on hardware :) The little Microsoft flag sticker that was on my Dell Latitude got replaced with a sticker that has a Tux and 'linux inside' on it. :) > I had another, probably crazy idea. Would it be possible to utilize the > current vendor/device PCI ID database to create Linux friendliness matrix > site? > > And if you let yourself get carried away, you can also imagine a little > multi-platform utility. It would run on a test system collecting PCI IDs > before submitting them to the site to get the system's overall Linux > friendliness rating. This is a can of worms, and then some. For instance, let's consider this Latitude. *THIS* one has an NVidia Quadro NVS 110M in it. However, that's not the default graphics card on a Latitude D820. So what number do you put in? Do you use: a) the *default* graphics card b) the one *I* have with the open-source driver c) the same one, but with the NVidia binary driver? (Remember that "users" have different criteria than "developers" - most users would consider this entire thread "intellectual wanking", especially since the patch that spawned it got withdrawn. And 'Frames Per Second' trumps that stupid little 'P' in the oops message. Failure to understand this mindset guarantees that your computation of a "friendliness rating" is yet more intellectual wanking... ;) Similar issues are involved with the wireless card - the Intel 3945 I have isn't the default. Repeat for several different disk options, and at least 4 or 5 different CD/ROM/DVD options. Add in the fact that Dell often changes suppliers for disk and CD/DVD drives, and you have a nightmare coming... And then there's stuff on this machine that are *not* options, but don't matter to me. I see an 'O2 Micro' Firewire in the 'lspci' output. I have no idea how well it works. I don't care what it contributes to the score. On the other hand, somebody who uses external Firewire disk enclosures may be *very* concerned about it, but not care in the slightest about the wireless card. Bonus points for figuring out what to do with systems that have some chip that's a supported XYZ driver, but wired up behind a squirrely bridge with some totally bizarre IRQ allocation, so you end up with something that's visible on lspci but not actually *usable* in any real sense of the term... > Something like that could really help end users to select the right system and > would reward those who do the right thing. "You are trapped in a maze of twisty little configurations, all different..." --==_Exmh_1166591475_3316P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFFiMXzcC3lWbTT17ARAgEOAKClJHgAWN1Zo21KaDo8mskiSZt9jQCggF3P VmeIaxcSDFjiG2nnQ3bM5Io= =susH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1166591475_3316P-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/