Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <YVzGVmJXEDH0HfIL@ripper>
References: <20211005023750.2037631-1-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
 <CAE-0n52wN1s=Ph4r4iLposxNPfa562Bv1mM81j1KvNmWOQS1-Q@mail.gmail.com> <YVzGVmJXEDH0HfIL@ripper>
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
User-Agent: alot/0.9.1
Date:   Tue, 5 Oct 2021 15:36:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CAE-0n53FC7JCCJoye_uKeqaLKrZeHXLtvObxWFedaUzjirmBaA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/dp: Shorten SETUP timeout
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc:     Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
        Kuogee Hsieh <khsieh@codeaurora.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Sankeerth Billakanti <sbillaka@codeaurora.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2021-10-05 14:40:38)
> On Tue 05 Oct 11:45 PDT 2021, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> > Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2021-10-04 19:37:50)
> > > Found in the middle of a patch from Sankeerth was the reduction of the
> > > INIT_SETUP timeout from 10s to 100ms. Upon INIT_SETUP timeout the host
> > > is initalized and HPD interrupt start to be serviced, so in the case of
> > > eDP this reduction improves the user experience dramatically - i.e.
> > > removes 9.9s of bland screen time at boot.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Sankeerth Billakanti <sbillaka@codeaurora.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> >
> > Any Fixes tag? BTW, the delay design is pretty convoluted. I had to go
> > re-read the code a couple times to understand that it's waiting 100ms
> > times the 'delay' number. Whaaaaat?
> >
>
> I assume you're happy with the current 10s delay on the current
> devices, so I don't think we should push for this to be backported.
> I have no need for it to be backported on my side at least.
>

Sure. Fixes tag != backported to stable trees but it is close.

> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
>