Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 6 Oct 2021 08:38:37 +0800
From:   Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc:     Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/gpio: Fix gpio compiling error
Message-ID: <20211006003837.GB4410@sol>
References: <20210903012236.160858-1-lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
 <CACRpkdaMYdc4WLcLFMKd3MyyKnQpdhP3Wxkx6YPoR+0YmH8ifw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdaMYdc4WLcLFMKd3MyyKnQpdhP3Wxkx6YPoR+0YmH8ifw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 12:39:42AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Hi Li,
> 
> thanks for your patch!
> 
> It needs to be sent directly to Bartosz Golaszewski so he can apply
> it to the GPIO tree.
> 
> Thanks!
> Linus Walleij
> 
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 3:18 AM Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > [root@iaas-rpma gpio]# make
> > gcc     gpio-mockup-cdev.c  -o /home/lizhijian/linux/tools/testing/selftests/gpio/gpio-mockup-cdev
> > gpio-mockup-cdev.c: In function ‘request_line_v2’:
> > gpio-mockup-cdev.c:24:30: error: storage size of ‘req’ isn’t known
> >    24 |  struct gpio_v2_line_request req;
> >       |                              ^~~
> > gpio-mockup-cdev.c:32:14: error: ‘GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_OUTPUT’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘GPIOLINE_FLAG_IS_OUT’?
> >    32 |  if (flags & GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_OUTPUT) {
> >       |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > gpio-mockup-cdev.c includes <linux/gpio.h> which could be provided by
> > kernel-headers package, and where it's expected to declare
> > GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_OUTPUT. However distros or developers will not always
> > install the same kernel-header as we are compiling.
> >
> > So we can tell compiler to search headers from linux tree simply like others,
> > such as sched.
> >
> > CC: Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com>
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >
> > ---
> > V2: add more details about the fix
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/gpio/Makefile | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/gpio/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/gpio/Makefile
> > index 39f2bbe8dd3d..42ea7d2aa844 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/gpio/Makefile
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/gpio/Makefile
> > @@ -3,5 +3,6 @@
> >  TEST_PROGS := gpio-mockup.sh
> >  TEST_FILES := gpio-mockup-sysfs.sh
> >  TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED := gpio-mockup-cdev
> > +CFLAGS += -I../../../../usr/include
> >

While this fixes the bug at hand, I think the root cause is that I
removed all the CFLAGS, assuming they were only relevant for the old
code and that lib.mk set sensible defaults (it doesn't), when in
fact most of it should've been retained, specifically:

CFLAGS += -O2 -g -Wall -I../../../../usr/include/

The -Wall turns up an uninitialised variable warning.
It is a false positive, but should be fixed regardless.

Any problems with me creating a series to do that, with the first patch
fixing the uninitialised variable and the second being this patch,
though with the full CFLAGS restored?

Cheers,
Kent.