Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030282AbWLTTGc (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:06:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030286AbWLTTGb (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:06:31 -0500 Received: from lazybastard.de ([212.112.238.170]:38363 "EHLO longford.lazybastard.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030282AbWLTTGb (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:06:31 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 19:03:38 +0000 From: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel To: Yakov Lerner Cc: Kernel Subject: Re: two architectures,same source tree Message-ID: <20061220190338.GA13966@lazybastard.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 706 Lines: 23 On Wed, 20 December 2006 20:32:20 +0200, Yakov Lerner wrote: > > Is it easily possible to build two architectures in > the same source tree (so that intermediate fles > and resut files do not interfere ) ? I'd try something like this: make O=../foo ARCH=foo make O=../bar ARCH=bar But as I'm lazy I'll leave the debugging to you. :) Jörn -- Linux [...] existed just for discussion between people who wanted to show off how geeky they were. -- Rob Enderle - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/