Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 18 Nov 2001 10:14:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 18 Nov 2001 10:14:37 -0500 Received: from swazi.realnet.co.sz ([196.28.7.2]:15047 "HELO netfinity.realnet.co.sz") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 18 Nov 2001 10:14:21 -0500 Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 17:22:23 +0200 (SAST) From: Zwane Mwaikambo X-X-Sender: To: Dave Jones Cc: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] moving F0 0F bug check to bugs.h In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Dave Jones wrote: > - (unmaintained?) SGI visws support. > - bootmem allocator. > - CPU identification. > - CPU feature enabling/disabling. > - CPU errata workarounds. > > Whilst you get to know your way around the 3000 or so lines after hacking > there a few times, it's constantly growing with each new CPU we support. > I think it's going to come to a point where this has to be split up to > some extent to keep it maintainable. Indeed the whole setup.c is a bit confusing, a cpusetup.c file or somesuch would make things a bit simpler with maybe an exported function to setup.c in the nature of cpu_detect(...). In your 2.5 todo, are you going to move the errata/bugs to the same cpusetup file or a seperate one? Cause now that i look at it, we got errata (e.g. AMD T13) in setup.c f00f etc, then popad and friends in bugs.h. Thanks, Zwane Mwaikambo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/