Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932750AbWLTUgB (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:36:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932701AbWLTUgB (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:36:01 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]:17104 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932735AbWLTUgA (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:36:00 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=BJg5YTz0iFjbUsJyVV6W/ELpMpxayZd7LwkwruNllA9p7Tt2rMqZzuZiCMfXs70iSq8m5OShLaPq5VmjU9nb1p4BMaaFiRjObKpTMrlo6oq0rPVXDvPY/BEAtreQP1vhSFMhCmKtN7T8VFbo40oG0n3kEKKMbFuAWImQTGU9lf4= Message-ID: <45899EFF.8010906@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:37:19 -0800 From: walt Organization: none User-Agent: Thunderbird 3.0a1 (X11/20061220) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge CC: Frederik Deweerdt , Andrew Morton , "Andrew J. Barr" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Beulich , Andi Kleen , "Eric W. Biederman" Subject: Re: [-mm patch] ptrace: Fix EFL_OFFSET value according to i386 pda changes (was Re: BUG on 2.6.20-rc1 when using gdb) References: <1166406918.17143.5.camel@r51.oakcourt.dyndns.org> <20061219164214.4bc92d77.akpm@osdl.org> <45891CD1.4050506@goop.org> <20061220183521.GA28900@slug> <45898D4E.1030507@goop.org> In-Reply-To: <45898D4E.1030507@goop.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 915 Lines: 23 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Frederik Deweerdt wrote: >> Same problems here with 2.6.20-rc1-mm1 (ie with the %gs->%fs patch). >> It seems to me that the problem comes from the EFL_OFFSET no longer >> beeing accurate. >> The following patch fixes the problem for me. >> > > Thanks Frederik; that's exactly the kind of thing I thought it might > be. I wonder if there's some way we can make this more robust > though... Does this work for you? I did a slightly larger cleanup > which should make it less fragile and more comprehensible. Hi Jeremy, Your patch works fine for me. (I didn't try the first patch, but I will if anyone wants.) Thanks! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/