Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:d5a5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gn37csp293076pxb; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 05:14:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyXjjXAaGMsHt0rv4cSnEoDr0n3HQvXBewv0a3f9zmNmbH+IlsTxQNLP2tvcPIvq5PkLQho X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1103:b0:13e:ec6d:524a with SMTP id n3-20020a170903110300b0013eec6d524amr6286225plh.85.1633522498171; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 05:14:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1633522498; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eUSPO6VFCsvaNiP6p9bde3nZi2bOdRIq49O5t4r+GdkdGCLD1wHcdV7bKW39s66jdg TmpXGny9gtjjFaOhrc6/saRrlkZys8Uh9TspB4OPmpBFMFQ9MRB94o6j37AWK3w4tABg yf3c3QaffyiGwLq1mmbZOy14FD63prVoJAZu4JO6gKCIPUsKUC2WJ2crU8+Xw2o2lP0P 6Nw/H5tPQ4of5cDddEsvpQDFMnQpFnOhMYVxf278K5vjPD6tYS/wZixctyPwMEmOAcDH gQ1nNtULGg20V2kBsSS5XNdm2PLaYcbmbHD4z7QmH4ulvisJqIg5aURN32//W2mlMBYr gRyg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dmarc-filter:sender:dkim-signature; bh=It/MRNqAXGNPyFh/a1DDiLRtR989/cjNw7hpzBembtQ=; b=WgcFubiia1/zsGkhRhSD/zoBv/N3lJE8q43i3aYCOlsFOFda6x/78r4/khwDtSpmEW TSVYLqnYoNWS66ItWTzXMrz8/M3dTuFuza1RvUzAp1L7TOSCIGqaiWtens70KEZ+s5bE apBwCoV/KUx/sd7jyD1TIm05Fkt3LOu045cgBKUZRbfo6bh0qRYQwXgTnUIkOoINq62h qEEniGcJpFohCVcMH0NAz2gE/4cStsp2UjAje9fOaKiD8D9ZrwdN23BkLL6sGmL+BM+P iCr1GPp7IRGpUeBCkWe30E9ld2+AR0KmPWxzETsFyIQnqCv1CI/gaFqC9FT8hu1uw+ys zm0Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=VOCGO+Fy; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k19si37103033pfu.108.2021.10.06.05.14.43; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 05:14:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=VOCGO+Fy; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238265AbhJFMPI (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 6 Oct 2021 08:15:08 -0400 Received: from so254-9.mailgun.net ([198.61.254.9]:28448 "EHLO so254-9.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238105AbhJFMPH (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Oct 2021 08:15:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1633522395; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: Date: Message-ID: From: References: Cc: To: Subject: Sender; bh=It/MRNqAXGNPyFh/a1DDiLRtR989/cjNw7hpzBembtQ=; b=VOCGO+FyylnuZe2HSgllvosLO8G+cS8rcmACsm3+lVsM56t9DohsTxsXVBXZl7URccrbFEWG vYUjeoPxCTxVZJOj/ysqmsW9EFWc2EyL0YxVRLS5M+KbJ+avsFP6jf3+sF5i77ulybj9mZzl CgwPob7K6BvyXeq5/ZD7+lRDG/o= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 198.61.254.9 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI0MWYwYSIsICJsaW51eC1rZXJuZWxAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n02.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 615d92da30ce13d2b444b434 (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Wed, 06 Oct 2021 12:13:14 GMT Sender: faiyazm=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 225C3C4360D; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 12:13:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_FAIL,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from [192.168.0.109] (unknown [49.204.182.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: faiyazm) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C39DC4338F; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 12:13:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 smtp.codeaurora.org 4C39DC4338F Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm: page_alloc: Add debug log in free_reserved_area for static memory To: David Hildenbrand , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: guptap@codeaurora.org References: <1632819849-511-1-git-send-email-faiyazm@codeaurora.org> <248ec931-7c16-3e2d-cc8f-8ce0dd4e923b@redhat.com> <0149edd5-fe7f-2786-413c-6de2eab3e30c@codeaurora.org> <1f6708d2-1ca8-6d1f-d9f0-855f2df755ed@codeaurora.org> From: Faiyaz Mohammed Message-ID: <88df48af-901b-5765-d92c-6d14c2b1f73e@codeaurora.org> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 17:43:08 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Sorry for delayed response. On 9/29/2021 10:33 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 29.09.21 10:58, Faiyaz Mohammed wrote: >> >> >> On 9/28/2021 4:46 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>> On 28.09.21 12:53, Faiyaz Mohammed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 9/28/2021 4:09 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>>> On 28.09.21 11:04, Faiyaz Mohammed wrote: >>>>>> For INITRD and initmem memory is reserved through "memblock_reserve" >>>>>> during boot up but it is free via "free_reserved_area" instead >>>>>> of "memblock_free". >>>>>> For example: >>>>>> [    0.294848] Freeing initrd memory: 12K. >>>>>> [    0.696688] Freeing unused kernel memory: 4096K. >>>>>> >>>>>> To get the start and end address of the above freed memory and to >>>>>> account >>>>>> proper memblock added memblock_dbg log in "free_reserved_area". >>>>>> After adding log: >>>>>> [    0.294837] memblock_free: [0x00000083600000-0x00000083603000] >>>>>> free_initrd_mem+0x20/0x28 >>>>>> [    0.294848] Freeing initrd memory: 12K. >>>>>> [    0.695246] memblock_free: [0x00000081600000-0x00000081a00000] >>>>>> free_initmem+0x70/0xc8 >>>>>> [    0.696688] Freeing unused kernel memory: 4096K. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Faiyaz Mohammed >>>>>> --- >>>>>>     mm/page_alloc.c | 5 +++++ >>>>>>     1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c >>>>>> index b37435c..f85c3b2 100644 >>>>>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c >>>>>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c >>>>>> @@ -8129,6 +8129,11 @@ unsigned long free_reserved_area(void *start, >>>>>> void *end, int poison, const char >>>>>>             pr_info("Freeing %s memory: %ldK\n", >>>>>>                 s, pages << (PAGE_SHIFT - 10)); >>>>>>     +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK >>>>>> +        memblock_dbg("memblock_free: [%#016llx-%#016llx] %pS\n", >>>>>> +            __pa(start), __pa(end), (void *)_RET_IP_); >>>>>> +#endif >>>>> >>>>> IMHO, the "memblock_free" part is misleading. Something was allocated >>>>> early via memblock, then we transitioned to the buddy, now we're >>>>> freeing >>>>> that early allocation via the buddy. >>>>> Yes, we're freeing the early allocation via buddy, but for proper >>>> memblock accounting we need this debug print. >>>> >>> >>> What do you mean with "accounting" ? These are debug statements. >>> >>> >> Yes, these are debug statements, which help to know the a-b address >> belongs to x callsite. This info is required when memblock=debug is >> passed through command line and CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK is enabled. > > The issue I'm having is talking in the name of memblock "memblock_dbg, > memblock_free", when memblock might no longer be around. We have other > places where we free early memblock allocations back to the buddy. I didn't find place where we free early memblock allocation back to the buddy. Why "memblock_dbg" print with "memblock_free" string?. - After buddy took over, buddy will free memblock reserved memory through free_reserved_area and it will print the freed memory size, but the freed memory through buddy still be part of memblock.reserved.regions. - To know the address ranges, added the "memblock_dbg" print along with "membloc_free" string. - If it is misleading or confusing, we can remove the "memblock_free" string from the "memblock_dgb" print and we can just print the address range when "memlock=debug" pass through command line. Thanks and regards, Mohammed Faiyaz