Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:d5a5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gn37csp515384pxb; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 09:37:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwBnZqzQJB73VZ1Gxfxby4rsp4Epvp6mO1G0PeGz1LArdRbrCDjut2ZXki99vuRkeeE9i42 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d979:: with SMTP id rp25mr24022799ejb.355.1633538242143; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 09:37:22 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1633538242; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bK3Q1hUW60bQAPjWa9Mbl4fLm2Z1egRE9V4QBUKiGeQCukT9LXVylkYe4sIJiXT+r0 yyJr4JzhumUspcEFk5OqnDCo/QhZKnCPzHoKorhmZA5AF5K5urcW6t/l5IfwOhOLYRTC ABBp2fbFBOO9Ie/1K0hP3NaGjx2mTmAfGkQ3QBpnNT3eJfJY840dxyRzRusrSmoh/QAF djTo9YEysWP6XhzZaDInmcz3zNyEerTDj06BjhFD9NNXXDzRnjZmrKcYPKwKMwgkuNJA c3MvOsCnjVSaf6UWv5SnKoAPJO4jn3b2mLXzuWEEjqm39STHLblnP48FX2q067g1rMpE wahg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=1FBnka3fj/OI7lVj/wD0RsGoMnDjzWD0ZXpJDTs5Ex4=; b=xa6AH8tcGc0KbwQwRsE+eMw96ymeJkA1XyKA0WVFAz9UGYW7Sr6eIBGSwXUxySNlTk mbWbQPE7kLtJv9DK7DzwUtS5v8M40q48kdX2U7fIyneEfOS3wJ+7G73F/U0HRLzsDitR lc8fG0EH1UDyNH7aYoo4k7rVfhIpWrZkZFR6QR/XERLrSoMc1g7m3tgmri348DzwFV2S cYxhGyQnE8LPG2O24JE0LHqCrtSeMJjNANdqDzMParySs4GOePnuVHACidfxLSpx9Rv7 0NmonQ1GRfmnOx2RjfFGXGgLZxcKICtxPcRpccIsHPTgrgC5bNZOq3hCnlNqAtBNHzNA 3zYA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=RkNXjzbd; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z10si31145252edd.355.2021.10.06.09.36.58; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 09:37:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=RkNXjzbd; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232807AbhJFQgQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 6 Oct 2021 12:36:16 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46448 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229719AbhJFQgP (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Oct 2021 12:36:15 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 622A9610E5; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 16:34:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1633538063; bh=ctlyh/MM/ZO1vAziMpXnSjbXLCBHhorGWU3Y4W6Lq/Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RkNXjzbdX5MCmCfXVkHWaWb2gGEEnzx2z8pkKs/2PZ4y3s2bPvSbF2h8KpdKmLJ4W UUNUavhpVkKqZT7phW5nnNaBJ/vCNyikpZ9oY1Aiuooj/j23c4JLXYP5MtmiUTpY+i jFHtPAJmCZUsJoT4wdzEIaRrXpmKG+4Sp1U8AWT8W8FdiRMPZo9SE2JVqMgFVmX7De AfwzYccfPCXKRQUprMR1UZYU1qJzR4PlF/HKHzD5IFD8hmArQdGd7tefjG9WoC+RJt Zqx+CUv9YYa8Hhy9FjPpwEZ2uOXrivJ7VzlyV17aEWTir3IxFq8GTkJ9Z6y+QdyAAf C1jMib4pXElyw== Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 09:34:23 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Stephen , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: kvm crash in 5.14.1? Message-ID: <20211006163423.GB24266@magnolia> References: <2b5ca6d3-fa7b-5e2f-c353-f07dcff993c1@gmail.com> <16c7a433-6e58-4213-bc00-5f6196fe22f5@gmail.com> <20210930175957.GA10573@magnolia> <20211004165432.GA24266@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20211004165432.GA24266@magnolia> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 09:54:32AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:59:57AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 03:21:09PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2021, Stephen wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I got this crash again on 5.14.7 in the early morning of the 27th. > > > > Things hung up shortly after I'd gone to bed. Uptime was 1 day 9 hours 9 > > > > minutes. > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000068 > > > > #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode > > > > #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page > > > > PGD 0 P4D 0 > > > > Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI > > > > CPU: 21 PID: 8494 Comm: CPU 7/KVM Tainted: G??????????? E???? 5.14.7 #32 > > > > Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI/X570 > > > > AORUS ELITE WIFI, BIOS F35 07/08/2021 > > > > RIP: 0010:internal_get_user_pages_fast+0x738/0xda0 > > > > Code: 84 24 a0 00 00 00 65 48 2b 04 25 28 00 00 00 0f 85 54 06 00 00 48 > > > > 81 c4 a8 00 00 00 44 89 e0 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 <48> 81 78 > > > > 68 a0 a3 > > > > > > > I haven't reproduced the crash, but the code signature (CMP against an absolute > > > address) is quite distinct, and is consistent across all three crashes. I'm pretty > > > sure the issue is that page_is_secretmem() doesn't check for a null page->mapping, > > > e.g. if the page is truncated, which IIUC can happen in parallel since gup() doesn't > > > hold the lock. > > > > > > I think this should fix the problems? > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/secretmem.h b/include/linux/secretmem.h > > > index 21c3771e6a56..988528b5da43 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/secretmem.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/secretmem.h > > > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ static inline bool page_is_secretmem(struct page *page) > > > mapping = (struct address_space *) > > > ((unsigned long)page->mapping & ~PAGE_MAPPING_FLAGS); > > > > > > - if (mapping != page->mapping) > > > + if (!mapping || mapping != page->mapping) > > > > I'll roll this out on my vm host and try to re-run the mass fuzztest > > overnight, though IT claims they're going to kill power to the whole > > datacenter until Monday(!)... > > ...which they did, 30 minutes after I sent this email. :( > > I'll hopefully be able to report back to the list in a day or two. Looks like everything went smoothly with the mass fuzz fstesting. I'll let you know if I see any further failures, but for now: Tested-by: Darrick J. Wong --D > --D > > > > > --D > > > > > return false; > > > > > > return mapping->a_ops == &secretmem_aops;