Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:d5a5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gn37csp561988pxb; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 10:31:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx6h7suWJnDGT6WTQ1MHyznu0cyrRYn5L7RHABtopVuXnKt9kDKxkzNumgTDZkqdCj8aHCp X-Received: by 2002:a63:af4a:: with SMTP id s10mr21483232pgo.469.1633541519050; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 10:31:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1633541519; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NDHTMwYLumOWIjIHLWhTix0NVE6e2PP2+vvU9UVuGkdFxJBg8w+MlaBI73ARp8NCqf 1xvXnmBGpdH4aHC7i2B/jefAf5RegQd+PrPabEHHIGU6sseGiBH3LX87jOUpooUiLZka Huw6lnWKmxgdnX74GwikJuoCWVbvaXKep3bWOeP26oJI0dx2fgYz9WWaza1AR2e5AfyM DpwIutEMOg+9HXa9cu4zzLfWi9ZKI+yFO8rO0g8REYygR4kzoyGJf3cf4YY98ieNiPFB iOFil791G+YydOjw9uwIREVLc1nYlBrRrO0JeU5C2F3m58+JRDWurolvAxO5boJ4xMrV hivw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=+z3LXUu/1si2QPHEWiw8Jg4RfIKY4m0J1xmVQuKjJq4=; b=biVhHDGZztkgx7C4lPPFq1h5DznGqXRqs+4ObA4RIVeJWXfLJ6XqVBzXtqesofh2Pu DQxVjBXadmQLTmSWybLOpafED8TxB8pBB53hs0bRecETj2Qvep2Ez8MHm2OpMbIN2Y08 8GopsMAu8yO8vtMTwRBqi5rEl7grUIA3nm86md9E+6/L4Y3dLkf23wJxoqbDhyGfyi5L UfQ9/jSswfM/OYqWBbjQyEEhck4XrzbfBJ3nYzxmjsmqyC0g12FDXKCAa5aYStihChAx fCTvKmGkLs70w/WE0tQTY45BTs/RFmAJHQJ/g6NF7UZWqT4Ay1ebhx8vCMy4G59+I/dy ZeFQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id pc8si7928718pjb.118.2021.10.06.10.31.38; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 10:31:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232027AbhJFRbb (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 6 Oct 2021 13:31:31 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:45152 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231624AbhJFRbb (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Oct 2021 13:31:31 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10129"; a="286936898" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,352,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="286936898" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Oct 2021 10:29:38 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,352,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="439199883" Received: from jons-linux-dev-box.fm.intel.com (HELO jons-linux-dev-box) ([10.1.27.20]) by orsmga006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Oct 2021 10:29:38 -0700 Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 10:24:50 -0700 From: Matthew Brost To: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tvrtko Ursulin Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 7/8] drm/i915: Inherit process nice for context scheduling priority Message-ID: <20211006172450.GA8103@jons-linux-dev-box> References: <20211004143650.699120-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> <20211004143650.699120-8-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211004143650.699120-8-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 03:36:49PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > Introduce the concept of context nice value which matches the process > nice. > > We do this by extending the struct i915_sched_attr and add a helper > (i915_sched_attr_priority) to be used to convert to effective priority > when used by backend code and for priority sorting. > > Context nice is then inherited from the process which creates the GEM > context and utilised secondary to context priority, only when the latter > has been left at the default setting, in order to avoid disturbing any > application made choices of low and high (batch processing and maybe > latency sensitive compositing). In those cases nice value adjusts the > effective priority in the narrow band of -19 to +20 around > I915_CONTEXT_DEFAULT_PRIORITY. > > This means that in theory userspace using the context priority uapi > directly has a wider range of possible adjustments (thought to be > beneficial), but in practice that only applies to execlists platforms. > With GuC there are only three priority buckets (less than zero is low > priority, zero is normal and greater than zero is high) which therefore > interact as expected with the nice adjustment. It makes the question of > should the nice be a sub-range of GEM priorities, or stretched across the > whole, a moot one. > Opps, sorry for the double reply to this patch - for some reason I thinking the below comment would be on the next patch. The GuC + DRM scheduler actually has 4 priorities with the highest reserved for the KMD, so 3 user levels which is what I think you mean. So how would this work with only 3 levels? The nice value can move a normal priority value to either low or high, right? Normal to low seems fine but would moving to high be an issue? I thought a high level was reserved for elevated user processes (e.g. a root user or a compositor)? Would it be ok for a non-elevated user process to be the same priority as an elevated process? Matt > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c | 1 + > .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h | 5 +++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c | 12 ++++++++---- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h | 14 ++++++++++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h | 8 ++++++++ > 8 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c > index 8d4d687ab1d0..fed0733cb652 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c > @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ proto_context_create(struct drm_i915_private *i915, unsigned int flags) > if (i915->params.enable_hangcheck) > pc->user_flags |= BIT(UCONTEXT_PERSISTENCE); > pc->sched.priority = I915_PRIORITY_NORMAL; > + pc->sched.nice = task_nice(current); > > if (flags & I915_CONTEXT_CREATE_FLAGS_SINGLE_TIMELINE) { > if (!HAS_EXECLISTS(i915)) { > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c > index e91d803a6453..1a02c65823a7 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c > @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static struct i915_priolist *to_priolist(struct rb_node *rb) > > static int rq_prio(const struct i915_request *rq) > { > - return READ_ONCE(rq->sched.attr.priority); > + return i915_request_priority(rq); > } > > static int effective_prio(const struct i915_request *rq) > @@ -3221,8 +3221,8 @@ static void kick_execlists(const struct i915_request *rq, > { > struct intel_engine_cs *engine = rq->engine; > struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine = engine->sched_engine; > + const int prio = i915_sched_attr_priority(attr); > const struct i915_request *inflight; > - const int prio = attr->priority; > > /* > * We only need to kick the tasklet once for the high priority > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c > index b5883a4365ca..f258607685a2 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c > @@ -2417,7 +2417,7 @@ static void guc_bump_inflight_request_prio(struct i915_request *rq, > const struct i915_sched_attr *attr) > { > struct intel_context *ce = rq->context; > - const int prio = attr->priority; > + const int prio = i915_sched_attr_priority(attr); > u8 new_guc_prio = map_i915_prio_to_guc_prio(prio); > > /* Short circuit function */ > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c > index 79da5eca60af..a8c6f3a64895 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c > @@ -1930,7 +1930,7 @@ static int print_sched_attr(const struct i915_sched_attr *attr, > return x; > > x += snprintf(buf + x, len - x, > - " prio=%d", attr->priority); > + " prio=%d nice=%d", attr->priority, attr->nice); > > return x; > } > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h > index 7bd9ed20623e..c2c4c344837e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h > @@ -399,6 +399,11 @@ long i915_request_wait(struct i915_request *rq, > #define I915_WAIT_PRIORITY BIT(1) /* small priority bump for the request */ > #define I915_WAIT_ALL BIT(2) /* used by i915_gem_object_wait() */ > > +static inline int i915_request_priority(const struct i915_request *rq) > +{ > + return i915_sched_attr_priority(&rq->sched.attr); > +} > + > void i915_request_show(struct drm_printer *m, > const struct i915_request *rq, > const char *prefix, > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c > index 534bab99fcdc..e75793e36454 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c > @@ -155,7 +155,9 @@ lock_sched_engine(struct i915_sched_node *node, > static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_sched_node *node, > const struct i915_sched_attr *attr) > { > - const int prio = max(attr->priority, node->attr.priority); > + const int prio = > + max(i915_sched_attr_priority(attr), > + i915_sched_attr_priority(&node->attr)); > struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine; > struct i915_dependency *dep, *p; > struct i915_dependency stack; > @@ -209,7 +211,7 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_sched_node *node, > if (node_signaled(p->signaler)) > continue; > > - if (prio > READ_ONCE(p->signaler->attr.priority)) > + if (prio > i915_sched_attr_priority(&p->signaler->attr)) > list_move_tail(&p->dfs_link, &dfs); > } > } > @@ -247,7 +249,8 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_sched_node *node, > lockdep_assert_held(&sched_engine->lock); > > /* Recheck after acquiring the engine->timeline.lock */ > - if (prio <= node->attr.priority || node_signaled(node)) > + if (prio <= i915_sched_attr_priority(&node->attr) || > + node_signaled(node)) > continue; > > GEM_BUG_ON(node_to_request(node)->engine->sched_engine != > @@ -257,7 +260,7 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_sched_node *node, > if (sched_engine->bump_inflight_request_prio) > sched_engine->bump_inflight_request_prio(from, attr); > > - WRITE_ONCE(node->attr.priority, prio); > + WRITE_ONCE(node->attr, *attr); > > /* > * Once the request is ready, it will be placed into the > @@ -305,6 +308,7 @@ void i915_sched_node_init(struct i915_sched_node *node) > void i915_sched_node_reinit(struct i915_sched_node *node) > { > node->attr.priority = I915_PRIORITY_INVALID; > + node->attr.nice = 0; > node->semaphores = 0; > node->flags = 0; > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h > index 0b9b86af6c7f..75ccc9f55d14 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.h > @@ -38,6 +38,20 @@ void i915_sched_node_fini(struct i915_sched_node *node); > void i915_schedule(struct i915_request *request, > const struct i915_sched_attr *attr); > > +static inline int i915_sched_attr_priority(const struct i915_sched_attr *attr) > +{ > + int prio = attr->priority; > + > + /* > + * Only allow I915_CONTEXT_DEFAULT_PRIORITY to be affected by the > + * nice setting. > + */ > + if (!prio) > + prio = -attr->nice; > + > + return prio; > +} > + > struct list_head * > i915_sched_lookup_priolist(struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine, int prio); > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h > index 24b9ac1c2ce2..159237aa7609 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h > @@ -29,6 +29,14 @@ struct i915_sched_attr { > * The &drm_i915_private.kernel_context is assigned the lowest priority. > */ > int priority; > + > + /** > + * @nice: context nice level > + * > + * Nice level follows the CPU scheduler nice value as set for the > + * process owning the GPU context. > + */ > + int nice; > }; > > /* > -- > 2.30.2 >