Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <YLss6ZNPMIXleLLF@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <YL5HvUqtsDXx5CzM@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <YL5U/zSb50SnbLgW@smile.fi.intel.com> <YL9hxPdPj0dYMyaD@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
 <CAHp75VcPuf6BLGf7Y3RO2M-gHMFZMTeb4ftnj_tbGS4TxvThxA@mail.gmail.com>
 <YMCsSqzmG4jb1Ojo@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <YMQ62d1EFFjRcv6w@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
 <YMd39tIPercgljll@smile.fi.intel.com> <YMeM1Xee9Yg3j21D@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <YMeRiDMet2JyOV4P@smile.fi.intel.com> <YV3Oonc5s3UpzRq0@smile.fi.intel.com> <CAMj1kXHjXcFePeRWDtxZnC6eHEeELA6kZXOU=sA9oDZ1HzW_Vg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXHjXcFePeRWDtxZnC6eHEeELA6kZXOU=sA9oDZ1HzW_Vg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 7 Oct 2021 10:23:12 +0300
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdLLZsJnektx+n=BGvGeaogN0r=viNJpbR-au5RUURi9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] firmware: dmi_scan: Make it work in kexec'ed kernel
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc:     Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Javier_Ti=C3=A1?= <javier.tia@gmail.com>,
        kexec@lists.infradead.org, Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 10:20 AM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 at 18:28, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 08:27:36PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 08:07:33PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

> > > Double checked, confirmed that it's NOT working.
> >
> > Any news here?
> >
> > Shall I resend my series?
>
> As I said before:
>
> """
> I would still prefer to get to the bottom of this before papering over
> it with command line options. If the memory gets corrupted by the
> first kernel, maybe we are not preserving it correctly in the first
> kernel.
> """

And I can't agree more, but above I asked about news, implying if
there is anything to test?
The issue is still there and it becomes a bit annoying to see my hack
patches in every tree I have been using.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko