Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:37:01 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: "Bob Picco" <bob.picco@hp.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, clameter@engr.sgi.com,
       apw@shadowen.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, bob.picco@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.6.20-rc1-mm1] sparsemem vmem_map optimzed pfn_valid()
 [0/2]
Message-Id: <20061221093701.7358642c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
In-Reply-To: <20061220200628.GA10271@localhost>
References: <20061216173136.fbc91fa6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
	<20061220200628.GA10271@localhost>
Organization: Fujitsu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1028
Lines: 29

On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:06:28 -0500
"Bob Picco" <bob.picco@hp.com> wrote:

> Sorry I was looking for AIM VII and/or reaim which are multiuser loads.
> The results (2.6.20-rc1-mm1) for EXTREME, SPARSEMEM+VMEMMAP and
> SPARSEMEM+VMEMMAP+your+patch are below. Note SPARSEMEM+VMEMMAP AIM VII
> wasn't benchmarked to higher load limit because of my time constraints. 
> The runs should be repeated more times.

Thank you.
> 
> Any difference between the three configurations looks insignificant and
> within benchmark noise.
> 
looks so ;)

Because I'm now exhausted by other works, I can't go ahead until the next year.
My concern is io-benchmark like iozone.

Andrew-san, please drop the patch set if anyone isn't interested in.
I'll retry with new benchmark result if necessary.

-Kame

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/