Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:d5a5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gn37csp1331653pxb; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 05:48:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxijDKSdxomhWAo1aljMO2Xgy+CLPeyIVNXUNfkRo/xo4u+ALUk7DDv10UprXm+AVBh6gR0 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1bc3:: with SMTP id ch3mr6039924edb.373.1633610910845; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 05:48:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1633610910; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RXnAM9yHjAQHPJNzOqc06OncL4Tmj7/oiiPhb5heEwzjiZovaCFMG57jFvXJCp2cNJ g7E5yJm9djBeP75V+5Uu25AEcJie/fnb5gAVutIWh+m4pHoleevM4rzrg7jMecLKEUGw hdpZzv3zwzXy9/BuOlrOhUh4aC3xHwHAZkesKtWkyEoT2RtQlKD95jAOkFmVcc8rcYoi /zvaKdIA7x5sguk90QNqb8bwP0dx+OPQt/+ttU59TtRHsEWrd0kaeH6z9abQXcfAFy3q DlVCJl7k82h+pvJ19Yu/T4zN73dxI+XoSEguMudoyWi4tpqxRHXjJF5yceTL+mro5RWs 5j2g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:message-id:date:dkim-signature:dkim-signature; bh=dUPSP/0CtUbFbuA5ncd6Qxn0jzmtyI9tiiEfTYZb3tI=; b=qwVUHi638EDFkOGy/abTqknochuTdwkAfX6hTx/8SDM6FOVeCbq1GSbTHuq4xzAAc9 ruvKsE3bCzNzJkGSOLjjbWPxGKYTpyPF/n0Vs42HaopStWM4WWPx4JVwln/cJ+fATh2x 15PZNSgUE+FQ4bMhmlVvnOVNMQnM8JiAGKiu50dm+wVun6c4CS4BX0Fzyw+iVUNuzHSR J+YehpLnqyF+Pe7bU/8Q7m4dOE0iGU5f0BYLUlP+UIbmdu28j3CtdgfeRQ/0IW+F6dtm FrE6pHCGbIrpj/AwdBZdzKNo4j2WmHmDm+Ff4fOkuyghClayHj2cWKMT2Q5NkfYH58AT VNxg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=VpPCI6DX; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=EPBqY4mr; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=suse.de Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b16si19473842eja.239.2021.10.07.05.48.06; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 05:48:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=VpPCI6DX; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=EPBqY4mr; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=suse.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241343AbhJGMps (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 7 Oct 2021 08:45:48 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de ([195.135.220.29]:50088 "EHLO smtp-out2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233175AbhJGMpr (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2021 08:45:47 -0400 Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9692D200BD; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 12:43:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1633610633; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dUPSP/0CtUbFbuA5ncd6Qxn0jzmtyI9tiiEfTYZb3tI=; b=VpPCI6DX4Z51iWnPexYihCcG1/bUO19FGljHB+jWacUbn8DALONv7RjBDTQSQSUelSJ8Mg 3TXwEuXHhSfqQTp5sWfTDnaSlnaQR0Brca84uBUc7oRf973an5UzUZI9xKe6QAopenhmd9 OasO7CeUwYDugxrS9WJPS1q8BbNMZHI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1633610633; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dUPSP/0CtUbFbuA5ncd6Qxn0jzmtyI9tiiEfTYZb3tI=; b=EPBqY4mrlFhWO6vZrdx8L0t7psWZPwjj/svW7BnIZW5talQSgpLM3GYK3PsGmj6SBX57My uvTAQdqVQvV3tdDw== Received: from alsa1.suse.de (alsa1.suse.de [10.160.4.42]) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74978A3B84; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 12:43:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 14:43:53 +0200 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Michael Forney , ALSA Development Mailing List , Takashi Iwai , Baolin Wang , y2038 Mailman List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Mark Brown , Baolin Wang Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v7 8/9] ALSA: add new 32-bit layout for snd_pcm_mmap_status/control In-Reply-To: References: <20191211212025.1981822-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20191211212025.1981822-9-arnd@arndb.de> <29QBMJU8DE71E.2YZSH8IHT5HMH@mforney.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/25.3 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 07 Oct 2021 13:48:44 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 12:53 PM Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Wed, 06 Oct 2021 19:49:17 +0200, Michael Forney wrote: > > > > > > Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > +#if defined(__BYTE_ORDER) ? __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN : defined(__BIG_ENDIAN) > > > > +typedef char __pad_before_uframe[sizeof(__u64) - sizeof(snd_pcm_uframes_t)]; > > > > +typedef char __pad_after_uframe[0]; > > > > +#endif > > > > + > > > > +#if defined(__BYTE_ORDER) ? __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN : defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN) > > > > +typedef char __pad_before_uframe[0]; > > > > +typedef char __pad_after_uframe[sizeof(__u64) - sizeof(snd_pcm_uframes_t)]; > > > > +#endif > > > > + > > > > +struct __snd_pcm_mmap_status64 { > > > > + __s32 state; /* RO: state - SNDRV_PCM_STATE_XXXX */ > > > > + __u32 pad1; /* Needed for 64 bit alignment */ > > > > + __pad_before_uframe __pad1; > > > > + snd_pcm_uframes_t hw_ptr; /* RO: hw ptr (0...boundary-1) */ > > > > + __pad_after_uframe __pad2; > > > > + struct __snd_timespec64 tstamp; /* Timestamp */ > > > > + __s32 suspended_state; /* RO: suspended stream state */ > > > > + __u32 pad3; /* Needed for 64 bit alignment */ > > > > + struct __snd_timespec64 audio_tstamp; /* sample counter or wall clock */ > > > > +}; > > > > + > > > > +struct __snd_pcm_mmap_control64 { > > > > + __pad_before_uframe __pad1; > > > > + snd_pcm_uframes_t appl_ptr; /* RW: appl ptr (0...boundary-1) */ > > > > + __pad_before_uframe __pad2; > > > > > > I was looking through this header and happened to notice that this > > > padding is wrong. I believe it should be __pad_after_uframe here. > > > > > > I'm not sure of the implications of this typo, but I suspect it > > > breaks something on 32-bit systems with 64-bit time (regardless of > > > the endianness, since it changes the offset of avail_min). > > Thanks a lot for the report! Yes, this is definitely broken in some ways. > > > Right, that's the expected breakage. It seems that the 64bit time on > > 32bit arch is still rare, so we haven't heard a regression by that, so > > far... > > It might actually be worse: on a native 32-bit kernel, both user space > and kernel see the same broken definition with a 64-bit time_t, which > would end up actually making it work as expected. However, in > compat mode, the layout seen on the 32-bit user space is now > different from what the 64-bit kernel has, which would in turn not > work, in both the SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_SYNC_PTR ioctl and in > the mmap() interface. > > Fixing the layout to look like the way we had intended would make > newly compiled applications work in compat mode, but would break > applications built against the old header on new kernels and also > newly built applications on old kernels. > > I still hope I missed something and it's not quite that bad, but I > fear the best we can do in this case make the broken interface > the normative one and fixing compat mode to write > mmap_control64->avail_min in the wrong location for > SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_SYNC_PTR, as well as disabling > the mmap() interface again for compat tasks. > > As far as I can tell, the broken interface will always result in > user space seeing a zero value for "avail_min". Can you > make a prediction what that would mean for actual > applications? Will they have no audio output, run into > a crash, or be able to use recover and appear to work normally > here? No, fortunately it's only about control->avail_min, and fiddling this value can't break severely (otherwise it'd be a security problem ;) In the buggy condition, it's always zero, and the kernel treated as if 1, i.e. wake up as soon as data is available, which is OK-ish for most applications. Apps usually don't care about the wake-up condition so much. There are subtle difference and may influence on the stability of stream processing, but the stability usually depends more strongly on the hardware and software configurations. That being said, the impact by this bug (from the application behavior POV) is likely quite small, but the contamination is large; as you pointed out, it's much larger than I thought. The definition in uapi/sound/asound.h is a bit cryptic, but IIUC, __snd_pcm_mmap_control64 is used for 64bit archs, right? If so, the problem rather hits more widely on 64bit archs silently. Then, the influence by this bug must be almost negligible, as we've had no bug report about the behavior change. We may just fix it in kernel and for new library with hoping that no one sees the actual problem. Or, we may provide a complete new set of mmap offsets and ioctl to cover both broken and fixed interfaces... The decision depends on how perfectly we'd like to address the bug. As of now, I'm inclined to go for the former, but I'm open for more opinions. thanks, Takashi