Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210821030519.127-1-yuzenghui@huawei.com> <39c2b2f9-4de2-8e7d-2135-96f1dab750e0@canonical.com>
 <5991e347-18f0-30cd-58b9-9e3276bd98bd@huawei.com> <YV7HGniKSKe7nXp/@arm.com> <1ebc899f-b7d7-fff4-9204-a0edd2be4387@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <1ebc899f-b7d7-fff4-9204-a0edd2be4387@huawei.com>
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date:   Thu, 7 Oct 2021 15:14:21 +0200
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a30pdkERK2CREDmpVDtL9+mVBU3iok8DkNoayOTSE9yFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: defconfig: drop obsolete ARCH_* configs
To:     Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 12:24 PM Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On 2021/10/7 18:08, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 05:42:46PM +0800, Zenghui Yu wrote:
> >> On 2021/8/23 21:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> On 21/08/2021 05:05, Zenghui Yu wrote:
> >>>> Per commit 4a9a1a5602d8 ("arm64: socfpga: merge Agilex and N5X into
> >>>> ARCH_INTEL_SOCFPGA") and commit 89d4f98ae90d ("ARM: remove zte zx
> >>>> platform"), they can be dropped from defconfig now.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
> >>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 3 ---
> >>>>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
> >>
> >> I have no idea about which tree should this patch go via, so a gentle
> >> ping here. I've verified that this can still be applied cleanly on top
> >> of today's -next.
> >
> > Usually defconfig changes go in via the arm-soc tree rather than the
> > arm64 one.
>
> Thanks for the pointer!
>
> [+ soc@kernel.org]

Applied to the arm/defconfig branch for 5.16, thanks!

        Arnd