Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:d5a5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gn37csp1725324pxb; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 13:50:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz5L4ogF86uVO8L5GGeLOta1iqQ5UKhQFlZUF5DpBZYgevGoaMDs9N/OdZt5zXwsPHvehXb X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:62a2:: with SMTP id nd34mr8164193ejc.356.1633639818439; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 13:50:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1633639818; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zG57QTNB71zMNOYrfRG60clXxVzM2vGtNbol0bHHKGJ4hcaB2MzqEy/bP3YI6YY2Ou qdhS90Ah9oblsKa64jVyA4GYb15HWbLeKdAGzcJ4N3l+YOBnHH6/HIdqtaIvCi93ahqk wdqu/mDqhCTTZC7/aooliJBszw8LIOtMBylvdFcvJSsVTsoDdP8qkX1RNFwzCnWy7PlR 7CQoATB1G5nuX2JZXsvfltRn3ZNnzP3s7c3XziulOhWn/o71W8leWBUPV422izlay+aw tVIublMvp6g24ZSY1ugmYmXdyowO2C6glLUcv1+d9RQtO3RODmoqy5QpRCNNLBkM56JM zHNw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=ig7nkEkGpLGZWLgvXwiGKx387sdA4PkT5M+E/T2tXZg=; b=PB94h5HbgFhUJAWMgvAQxpUusSSfKkrSfXwRJDIOtMygirK7uJp+TzdUIzskNExnr6 FUoISlM9Yl47wXFsJPx0v2XEMxNyroDGXc4+Mjbe4RsX5CHOPAmD5xNzA/VEsPHUYDcv OnOBmpwYvPX9I7HezoiKwnucIgH8NzZtv0Mt0+dtpnDwy79D4SvvVbO6WByL25l+vyOo RFsVyQPluAw0/sI9YYo2SuCWQOXzVhQGAYnb/J9Epb4IjaOFp2vYW5KFwpRY9SnuTvgR MFtcoBjnFlG1Bs58/SWHzkFym4yQDEIF/vPeIIx/mR78ksdF9d1ClgfayWP7KNmApEO3 JuyQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id nb24si777437ejc.544.2021.10.07.13.49.55; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 13:50:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243654AbhJGSro (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 7 Oct 2021 14:47:44 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:42604 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229778AbhJGSro (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2021 14:47:44 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 197Ihdq8011954; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 13:43:39 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 197IhbO3011953; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 13:43:37 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 13:43:37 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: "Paul A. Clarke" Cc: Kajol Jain , maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rnsastry@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jolsa@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf vendor events power10: Add metric events json file for power10 platform Message-ID: <20211007184337.GN10333@gate.crashing.org> References: <20211006073119.276340-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com> <20211006173248.GA7389@li-24c3614c-2adc-11b2-a85c-85f334518bdb.ibm.com> <20211007134750.GA243632@li-24c3614c-2adc-11b2-a85c-85f334518bdb.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211007134750.GA243632@li-24c3614c-2adc-11b2-a85c-85f334518bdb.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 08:47:50AM -0500, Paul A. Clarke wrote: > On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 12:32:48PM -0500, Paul A. Clarke wrote: > > > + { > > > + "BriefDescription": "Average cycles per instruction when the instruction finishes at dispatch", > > > > I'm not sure what that means. > > After doing a bit of research, I think it might be a bit more clear as: > "Average cycles per instruction when the NTF instruction finishes at dispatch" Is "next to finish" some defined and/or sensible term in this context? Or do you mean NTC here? Or what :-) Instructions do not finish in order at all generally. Segher