Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 8 Oct 2021 14:54:23 +0800
From:   Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        Dan Lustig <dlustig@nvidia.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>, palmer@dabbelt.com,
        paul.walmsley@sifive.com, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
        linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/memory-model: Provide extra ordering for
 unlock+lock pair on the same CPU
Message-ID: <YV/rH0TeokccdbMD@boqun-archlinux>
References: <20210930130823.2103688-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com>
 <YVZiGdWXfbsHs2xa@boqun-archlinux>
 <878rz4nkw2.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <878rz4nkw2.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 04:30:37PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> writes:
> > (Add linux-arch in Cc list)
> >
> > Architecture maintainers, this patch is about strengthening our memory
> > model a little bit, your inputs (confirmation, ack/nack, etc.) are
> > appreciated.
> 
> Hi Boqun,
> 
> I don't feel like I'm really qualified to give an ack here, you and the
> other memory model folk know this stuff much better than me.
> 
> But I have reviewed it and it matches my understanding of how our
> barriers work, so it looks OK to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc)
> 

Thanks!

Regards,
Boqun

> cheers