Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:d5a5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gn37csp2250836pxb; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 04:12:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy/jq9XGS5irIi3h5A5vZW2vrB+X+l4lQFH17GLmav4gkjhBsg6dwpI4wA8wyavR7y1MC9T X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8d8b:b0:138:e09d:d901 with SMTP id v11-20020a1709028d8b00b00138e09dd901mr9120300plo.34.1633691532614; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 04:12:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1633691532; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JvWUWGz5OnO6+N/N1xlg617w5aXNAlGLbqJ5fLQsG/nyTe4bopufO6e4j62yPb3Qol Q/D+c3hFs14j86sX26osZh2hAY2wvTwl1IgZG6LwCpFBx345cLJDS6blVp5DjNaN2l2s csCBCZSv4Oi4G9afDyE0kfoZQ+svxLuqd2+Oyb6O8eutdPmNvZadg/hue/LXeGd2KfdI q6mNqbDWrk8Nq4C5Jehrt4xGy2EfeEyHNXKgxcKfbaD9WXvzM8nVGhpr/Drfsr0T6yN3 NUEjqeQoiYVXFRP5dlEiKceeREUgkwaMUfEqdzKXP4JRC5fcK5sSuVvgoa2CsY2XWWyE sKWA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=beL+lHu4Yb6ST/YHe2oKhpNvDASDezmXv1HiQU4m3Qg=; b=YPh3lyWuTHIUeN4y6QyG6zDyVbXlr+1dwEqfp0l47YLCh13MIWlwexhzUN0ZxLd6Lm ro48ZcUcaD5qdFIDjDkmxrK66NUMrHoX3B1L6MMA3d5OsyGsP7dP7gXoNnQtR/L9onL9 sBLCloCP/BelgmzohYQKthWcY+LRMlHdx1JZjotyYVBNCnKXNYuFwhL8IUu8bBftCj6c IVYWfztfu9evEkdhBrXGTQpjHOQRbW56cSgd7IsmM9owH0/KHgqoAc0odhGXSbRET8KW Gey3jEZpqiS5zHJZ9dotcbk0q1+1ZiRIMrTgmO/sLEjklbMrfhniyeKOdT+RwiMWOPhz BaaA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b="SA248/Mn"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e25si2962771pgr.17.2021.10.08.04.11.57; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 04:12:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b="SA248/Mn"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239972AbhJHLNE (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 8 Oct 2021 07:13:04 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:44124 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232629AbhJHLNC (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Oct 2021 07:13:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1633691466; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=beL+lHu4Yb6ST/YHe2oKhpNvDASDezmXv1HiQU4m3Qg=; b=SA248/MngBr4V+O4KWXJhqYVAUc4QN6L4IzeVRGNsOinXZY7NS/54RammEPuqkQj98XsgB s6ZNGsLjzAmIZkpjPmujpceUykyOnunkF0fMUSor4xJaGv8r0FEqnK7WRg3Am9LwtbT9V9 RmUVp+w3AHvi9PXJfmic+i2yr+iK6Io= Received: from mail-wr1-f69.google.com (mail-wr1-f69.google.com [209.85.221.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-473-Jo9VAmcQPvmVP0721dZY0Q-1; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 07:11:05 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Jo9VAmcQPvmVP0721dZY0Q-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f69.google.com with SMTP id d13-20020adf9b8d000000b00160a94c235aso7048831wrc.2 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 04:11:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=beL+lHu4Yb6ST/YHe2oKhpNvDASDezmXv1HiQU4m3Qg=; b=GHNPDkabVZWARJvDt3ymn3Ha1cp3e4fMUofq0QXkICX2g71hOJp+/Q0HSHPq2HVfk3 jB4c82IScPm6RTMrIlqG7IlU2BK8Y7O99MABOiMbcuwqfN9qZEfePUQs8X2Jt1aIRZhL ea+o9IOL3Jyz/ezOlSr8MlP5rZ0DaaH5lAsgaJar12sz1XgyKToxUybs9zaEf7o8Cgmd TU+RTiQqcwK6cM5ih0ejVUwBHvEHFigurClmWg2uTKeoJSu7LptSWQum5xf2evdCTL9T 1WUFSfngSb06UVORSz+0izEcQIOxZBx5mAGfMv4JzMnYC76pr/OdspTQSbhNMoR8YU5i H7RQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5313rZYzCRXBC7NfIZ3esioq6Q5ZcfVR0GxiNKBiLIQZTxbtdvNX zEY2ZXUO3B4dbe5QnIh5ViTCW8HayWrHiLqWlWiBNGGeCv2trzwULModMAUgE7oAV5Lq9xS2GJv 2flmRlkD4ih0aOBfchIq2Qr1F X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cb4b:: with SMTP id v11mr2775632wmj.155.1633691464372; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 04:11:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cb4b:: with SMTP id v11mr2775600wmj.155.1633691464206; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 04:11:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vitty.brq.redhat.com (g-server-2.ign.cz. [91.219.240.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z12sm780472wmk.38.2021.10.08.04.11.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 08 Oct 2021 04:11:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Vitaly Kuznetsov To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Long Li Cc: Bart Van Assche , "longli@linuxonhyperv.com" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org" , Jonathan Corbet , KY Srinivasan , Haiyang Zhang , Stephen Hemminger , Wei Liu , Dexuan Cui , Bjorn Andersson , Hans de Goede , "Williams, Dan J" , Maximilian Luz , Mike Rapoport , Ben Widawsky , Jiri Slaby , Andra Paraschiv , Siddharth Gupta , Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: [Patch v5 0/3] Introduce a driver to support host accelerated access to Microsoft Azure Blob for Azure VM In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2021 13:11:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87fstb3h6h.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: ... > > Not to mention the whole crazy idea of "let's implement our REST api > that used to go over a network connection over an ioctl instead!" > That's the main problem that you need to push back on here. > > What is forcing you to put all of this into the kernel in the first > place? What's wrong with the userspace network connection/protocol that > you have today? > > Does this mean that we now have to implement all REST apis that people > dream up as ioctl interfaces over a hyperv transport? That would be > insane. As far as I understand, the purpose of the driver is to replace a "slow" network connection to API endpoint with a "fast" transport over Vmbus. So what if instead of implementing this new driver we just use Hyper-V Vsock and move API endpoint to the host? -- Vitaly