Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423017AbWLUShP (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:37:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423016AbWLUShP (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:37:15 -0500 Received: from sabe.cs.wisc.edu ([128.105.6.20]:56944 "EHLO sabe.cs.wisc.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423021AbWLUShN (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Dec 2006 13:37:13 -0500 Message-ID: <458AD43C.3050603@cs.wisc.edu> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:36:44 -0600 From: Mike Christie User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060313) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: device-mapper development CC: Jens Axboe , mchristi@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, agk@redhat.com Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 1/8] rqbased-dm: allow blk_get_request() to be called from interrupt context References: <20061220134848.GF10535@kernel.dk> <20061220.125002.71083198.k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com> <20061220184917.GJ10535@kernel.dk> <20061220.165549.39151582.k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com> <20061221075305.GD17199@kernel.dk> <458ACB69.8000603@cs.wisc.edu> <458ACEB1.3030406@cs.wisc.edu> <20061221182432.GB17199@kernel.dk> <458AD2E0.40807@cs.wisc.edu> In-Reply-To: <458AD2E0.40807@cs.wisc.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1463 Lines: 31 Mike Christie wrote: > Jens Axboe wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 21 2006, Mike Christie wrote: >>> Or the block layer code could set up the clone too. elv_next_request >>> could prep a clone based on the orignal request for the driver then dm >>> would not have to worry about that part. >> It really can't, since it doesn't know how to allocate the clone >> request. I'd rather export this functionality as helpers. >> > > What do you think about dm's plan to break up make_request into a > mapping function and in to the part the builds the bio into a request. > This would fit well with them being helpers and being able to allocate > the request from the correct context. > > I see patches for that did not get posted, but I thought Joe and > Alasdair used to talk about that a lot and in the dm code I think there > is sill comments about doing it. Maybe the dm comments mentioned the > merge_fn, but I guess the merge_fn did not fit what they wanted to do or > something. I think Alasdair talked about this at one of his talks at OLS > or it was in a proposal for the kernel summit. I can dig up the mail if > you want. > Ignore that. The problem would be that we may not want to decide which path to use at map time. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/