Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:d5a5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gn37csp3415377pxb; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 09:46:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwAd58gf/NAoti5XK96IFdypenRfdfu5fXHxIDrncCmCxGKFfzVPy6CoiMl+ASIMSzQF7VV X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c78d:: with SMTP id n13mr23849318eds.137.1633797992275; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 09:46:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1633797992; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RuVd3mEws4FP/K+cw0nrdJ25TqioEyU9rKZBrh1uH7ZCOLlRic4HH0Scyi5aJbMwbm CUwU7OO6Pzoaj6VSjrkZfD63UD2uoLzyAh0QBxnI/WQWOHVN7glyV0HIiTgVGNPbkH6/ hhXj9oCxSl3IdvSYyBhU+cr4By1jMibapQ+8A5DGj0ElPMVdVRMgtFUlDPlGw7AxRTYD 8EEGKhySM1il73rw6gIY8cFZ16qih0Q+muPTwgoA95Dy6HLgwY3w95F+Ip4hCozovLkw NEd4+isMdksWrCk0J5oYC4UVMPWQrUpMYA9ihI/tDspinmqLl8tb0jDaYcJpGMT8Euv2 VAnw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:cc:to:from :subject; bh=9Fq+avF0mph7zq/e7amUcyZxbYlgdLaDa3A5MXfDBwE=; b=we76PF62GFwDFLh/JMbce4rEtnPLvjN31b901z87J7vAOrVGfJ1b817koEIkpGlgi8 Y6OR5+1FuF1Ebwd9nYLzZZPvRJC70UdzldpzvAg+K2WeCIT3ml0KYec+pn93dGPxTyMd nvWQCFZqkvMhVyhykQ8nhSoENesQaDnUdEh1apyg5q5KJvhFgt9jby+2OCa8/KLin5fg cZJJxeSA19p7a+IeSJSOe6QWrgl7MeO9uto5prWK0Ijq3FNNuY0D8xl/ReUWb9F2+E/q Txtdb4VcGrnKbVDJ+HaRqDlvX7bpXSiiJIehxDSrjOkBjcRpr4CAkFqqx0V5BhynM1Ho H4dg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n26si3851736ejz.9.2021.10.09.09.46.08; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 09:46:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232256AbhJIQqZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 9 Oct 2021 12:46:25 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:13412 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232425AbhJIQqW (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Oct 2021 12:46:22 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10132"; a="226572014" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,360,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="226572014" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Oct 2021 09:44:24 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,360,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="525411749" Received: from dwillia2-desk3.jf.intel.com (HELO dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com) ([10.54.39.25]) by fmsmga008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Oct 2021 09:44:24 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v3 05/10] cxl/pci: Make more use of cxl_register_map From: Dan Williams To: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ben Widawsky , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2021 09:44:23 -0700 Message-ID: <163379786381.692348.10643599219049157444.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <163379783658.692348.16064992154261275220.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <163379783658.692348.16064992154261275220.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: StGit/0.18-3-g996c MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ben Widawsky The structure exists to pass around information about register mapping. Use it for passing @barno and @block_offset, and eliminate duplicate local variables. The helpers that use @map do not care about @cxlm, so just pass them a pdev instead. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky [djbw: separate @base conversion] [djbw: reorder before cxl_pci_setup_regs() refactor to improver readability] Signed-off-by: Dan Williams --- drivers/cxl/pci.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c index 21dd10a77eb3..9f006299a0e3 100644 --- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c +++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c @@ -306,12 +306,13 @@ static int cxl_pci_setup_mailbox(struct cxl_mem *cxlm) return 0; } -static void __iomem *cxl_pci_map_regblock(struct cxl_mem *cxlm, - u8 bar, u64 offset) +static void __iomem *cxl_pci_map_regblock(struct pci_dev *pdev, + struct cxl_register_map *map) { void __iomem *addr; - struct device *dev = cxlm->dev; - struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev); + int bar = map->barno; + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + resource_size_t offset = map->block_offset; /* Basic sanity check that BAR is big enough */ if (pci_resource_len(pdev, bar) < offset) { @@ -332,9 +333,9 @@ static void __iomem *cxl_pci_map_regblock(struct cxl_mem *cxlm, return addr; } -static void cxl_pci_unmap_regblock(struct cxl_mem *cxlm, void __iomem *base) +static void cxl_pci_unmap_regblock(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *base) { - pci_iounmap(to_pci_dev(cxlm->dev), base); + pci_iounmap(pdev, base); } static int cxl_pci_dvsec(struct pci_dev *pdev, int dvsec) @@ -360,12 +361,12 @@ static int cxl_pci_dvsec(struct pci_dev *pdev, int dvsec) return 0; } -static int cxl_probe_regs(struct cxl_mem *cxlm, void __iomem *base, +static int cxl_probe_regs(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *base, struct cxl_register_map *map) { struct cxl_component_reg_map *comp_map; struct cxl_device_reg_map *dev_map; - struct device *dev = cxlm->dev; + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; switch (map->reg_type) { case CXL_REGLOC_RBI_COMPONENT: @@ -420,12 +421,13 @@ static int cxl_map_regs(struct cxl_mem *cxlm, struct cxl_register_map *map) return 0; } -static void cxl_decode_register_block(u32 reg_lo, u32 reg_hi, - u8 *bar, u64 *offset, u8 *reg_type) +static void cxl_decode_regblock(u32 reg_lo, u32 reg_hi, + struct cxl_register_map *map) { - *offset = ((u64)reg_hi << 32) | (reg_lo & CXL_REGLOC_ADDR_MASK); - *bar = FIELD_GET(CXL_REGLOC_BIR_MASK, reg_lo); - *reg_type = FIELD_GET(CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MASK, reg_lo); + map->block_offset = + ((u64)reg_hi << 32) | (reg_lo & CXL_REGLOC_ADDR_MASK); + map->barno = FIELD_GET(CXL_REGLOC_BIR_MASK, reg_lo); + map->reg_type = FIELD_GET(CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MASK, reg_lo); } /** @@ -462,34 +464,23 @@ static int cxl_pci_setup_regs(struct cxl_mem *cxlm) for (i = 0, n_maps = 0; i < regblocks; i++, regloc += 8) { u32 reg_lo, reg_hi; - u8 reg_type; - u64 offset; - u8 bar; pci_read_config_dword(pdev, regloc, ®_lo); pci_read_config_dword(pdev, regloc + 4, ®_hi); - cxl_decode_register_block(reg_lo, reg_hi, &bar, &offset, - ®_type); + map = &maps[n_maps]; + cxl_decode_regblock(reg_lo, reg_hi, map); /* Ignore unknown register block types */ - if (reg_type > CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MEMDEV) + if (map->reg_type > CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MEMDEV) continue; - base = cxl_pci_map_regblock(cxlm, bar, offset); + base = cxl_pci_map_regblock(pdev, map); if (!base) return -ENOMEM; - map = &maps[n_maps]; - map->barno = bar; - map->block_offset = offset; - map->reg_type = reg_type; - - ret = cxl_probe_regs(cxlm, base + offset, map); - - /* Always unmap the regblock regardless of probe success */ - cxl_pci_unmap_regblock(cxlm, base); - + ret = cxl_probe_regs(pdev, base + map->block_offset, map); + cxl_pci_unmap_regblock(pdev, base); if (ret) return ret;