Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp32389pxb; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 12:35:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxZs7ZeoybZMntOfWCyzdASLZ5VmeoBo6/JocH0pCXJBruHaTHQfNNFo7hNNm8JskMYn2KJ X-Received: by 2002:a65:4345:: with SMTP id k5mr10983288pgq.410.1633808123058; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 12:35:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1633808123; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KGglzNiB7qm36y6XuclL9BwQUTKUXCazO8TfX2ZJm9wTLrW2Q5X+Rx5AcQCKYMwf5y zds7E17Gbw0dxDidv31egz5gJCpYtF/LSvpmSAY0+IXeumGRmOWpHmk3daiazMB3AXgD CBVzsEBZLMgmeJ4iTGX/85MOL8rgJGGKH+SrXNU3NtvkFdBGh8osWE/Vulv2g9FK73o9 l47dpT+Cb63jxTFwJDhyoZesScktDOLtAE7XN+gDU02031Lu4SeS+yV89lYiDYBNiuQy DbxWXTWsB5OW2ZETqlPDFlozb8+ZY3q0Ah0DHavh1wxfyQ/Ordu0dQNnuXLi6XoGkEWC Jy/Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id :cc:to:subject:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=fX6B3OCFKTs9Z2THMtjC2lKC8OTImP1906QvoIabr1E=; b=NWFFhzf5ng1f3kqcvamPtCNNCe4SjstGn/pIGT/0Z/Q+LvO3UsrxJkeXnPM8bQotiM nqctsomfM67pipeWT+SmoyKqj68oJeo66Lk/lP0GZzATMrofKWe4/M5dY2sdp6f5XpZG NU+bZDaZAJLCWtCelsmgq+dQuXBiK3LIL0/BlnTWuLccptPkDQqLl6vrWvtTr9m8ekpK sGMqyDk4P9c+o13yFhXdAYPafL9nV+B9JdqO+xyTZpPXNEj+FP2VVQNCH1C9p1LxR867 Edf5MITFEORs+isYroxA9U7RBInqkDJ1TWa1GeZFjbVbwSgU1laOG6qGNr6V4O+ROzXC GyiA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ixit.cz header.s=dkim header.b=Bihbb444; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=ixit.cz Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d18si4349346pgg.359.2021.10.09.12.34.43; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 12:35:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ixit.cz header.s=dkim header.b=Bihbb444; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=ixit.cz Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229953AbhJITeC (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 9 Oct 2021 15:34:02 -0400 Received: from ixit.cz ([94.230.151.217]:47568 "EHLO ixit.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229558AbhJITeB (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Oct 2021 15:34:01 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.138] (ip-89-176-96-70.net.upcbroadband.cz [89.176.96.70]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ixit.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7952920064; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 21:32:01 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ixit.cz; s=dkim; t=1633807921; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fX6B3OCFKTs9Z2THMtjC2lKC8OTImP1906QvoIabr1E=; b=Bihbb444bEpID2hfUuYddLFUfON5LcLQZ7VXo2DchfU8HdjFTPTh5HiE4kTG7DHWIb1c4H EgKi/6p0H1pGwTYones4A3sm+7XHDcbg8MCHTCiYds4hcJQZBCMiWexhzX8SWM7sEV3AHX uJSRFoSmr9VbiOGvi/puyxzUiEYyo0M= Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2021 21:30:32 +0200 From: David Heidelberg Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: add ipq4019 standalone entry To: Bjorn Andersson Cc: Andy Gross , Rob Herring , Stephen Boyd , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <20210909060450.10111-1-david@ixit.cz> X-Mailer: geary/40.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Yeah, this one patch is nonsense. Sending new patch series adding compatible to the IPQ40xx/AP-DK01.1-C1 instead of accepting generic board compatible. David On Sun, Sep 19 2021 at 23:19:19 -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Thu 09 Sep 01:04 CDT 2021, David Heidelberg wrote: > >> It seems that some ipq4019 boards just accepted architecture. >> >> Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml >> index 5169ebb97946..9b6dd7dc3825 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml >> @@ -174,6 +174,9 @@ properties: >> - qcom,ipq4019-dk04.1-c1 >> - const: qcom,ipq4019 > > It seems reasonable to expect that the board isn't just a > "qcom,ipq4019" > and in that case I believe this should cover all boards. > > Please let me know if I'm misunderstanding things. > > Regards, > Bjorn > >> >> + - items: >> + - const: qcom,ipq4019 >> + >> - items: >> - enum: >> - qcom,ipq8064-ap148 >> -- >> 2.33.0 >>