Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sun, 10 Oct 2021 00:37:39 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     "Pratik R. Sampat" <psampat@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     bristot@redhat.com, christian@brauner.io, ebiederm@xmission.com,
        lizefan.x@bytedance.com, tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
        mingo@kernel.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        cgroups@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux.dev,
        containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, pratik.r.sampat@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/5] ns: Introduce CPU Namespace
Message-ID: <20211009223739.GY174703@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20211009151243.8825-1-psampat@linux.ibm.com>
 <20211009151243.8825-2-psampat@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20211009151243.8825-2-psampat@linux.ibm.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 08:42:39PM +0530, Pratik R. Sampat wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 2d9ff40f4661..0413175e6d73 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
>  #include "pelt.h"
>  #include "smp.h"
>  
> +#include <linux/cpu_namespace.h>
> +
>  /*
>   * Export tracepoints that act as a bare tracehook (ie: have no trace event
>   * associated with them) to allow external modules to probe them.
> @@ -7559,6 +7561,7 @@ long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const struct cpumask *in_mask)
>  {
>  	cpumask_var_t cpus_allowed, new_mask;
>  	struct task_struct *p;
> +	cpumask_t temp;
>  	int retval;
>  
>  	rcu_read_lock();

You're not supposed to put a cpumask_t on stack. Those things can be
huge.

> @@ -7682,8 +7686,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(sched_setaffinity, pid_t, pid, unsigned int, len,
>  long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, struct cpumask *mask)
>  {
>  	struct task_struct *p;
> +	cpumask_var_t temp;
>  	unsigned long flags;
> -	int retval;
> +	int retval, cpu;
>  
>  	rcu_read_lock();
>  
> @@ -7698,6 +7703,13 @@ long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, struct cpumask *mask)
>  
>  	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
>  	cpumask_and(mask, &p->cpus_mask, cpu_active_mask);
> +	cpumask_clear(temp);

There's a distinct lack of allocating temp before use. Are you sure you
actually tested this?