Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp296225pxb; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 21:10:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyMAT1hvd6fapYv8oZfH1FVnyUbg8wiCUdH0D2TwUu19Jn3wiE3/zclOOiT3s6bT0GSxQZH X-Received: by 2002:a63:15:: with SMTP id 21mr12461582pga.479.1633839003014; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 21:10:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1633839003; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KO0WcsnrzBJQbcYCzV9fkzZ5+zUoSezPl+kYuCgCO3aute6brAZicQbOrVySh1jSoZ HvR/X+naSppo2cmqn2+sgcImp6b9AiYGiXkkdjQhJVXk3xPhfWl0K7vGmHVpkMvXfi0y bwkp2pnw71eCY6nI2eiTs3vaE04Xy37xN/fHt/EqWiOCkh53GDUhG0PYdxSchrd9DYa2 zGs+6p8zFqpegqdWuCRa4pNaHKUcIZl4AEJiF6gT3XXyJiTp0i88VOPpPCGXA6GixsZf tv1Hbiuouhfug4ze/9JMrq0OXFox6N8bxEvev7C5p86YOO36eoBD/BuRjYPH6y4u0nif jUEQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=jzAMCJ4kyItW2V3hm+hVQ9nRQyRT9lyfKfAFPwDCmh4=; b=0MczFN8gKBkaMun7Td5EyXSQof/vxrt0ZZmbDZwwq6OVvYDcVBWBAC0G2WtIUmb7TW wQcjUvE9gUQvFa+E3BsKAVDzb9lpooVA4jSb3HsjS9vwZXeLLXz9ttmqd+66ShMh7vfo 66D/Fp6C73+tBakGPoO9ZF0lCe29AF3xDru+d/CKfamybn4B+tID/h+NtWqnHqtXLVHs wT8N7KlClbD+kMcCCMzyOvmGWjNr5z935mQ4pQDv1hBtLpQYgfQKkPzRVQ1+vEipekYr zY3mEwchwQpLIefEdrwrwF4wpGuzzUp+6cmj73/WF+OwixbGzuHoETrYooDZTkzysgjv ij7A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k7si423076pjj.5.2021.10.09.21.09.37; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 21:10:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230318AbhJJEFv (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 10 Oct 2021 00:05:51 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:49894 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230018AbhJJEFs (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Oct 2021 00:05:48 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10132"; a="287586437" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,361,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="287586437" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Oct 2021 21:03:49 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,361,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="489983129" Received: from iweiny-desk2.sc.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.3.52.147]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Oct 2021 21:03:49 -0700 Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2021 21:03:49 -0700 From: Ira Weiny To: Dan Williams Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, Ben Widawsky , kernel test robot , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/10] cxl/pci: Make more use of cxl_register_map Message-ID: <20211010040349.GI3114988@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> References: <163379786381.692348.10643599219049157444.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <163381262522.716926.15040239940531720280.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <163381262522.716926.15040239940531720280.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 01:51:13PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > From: Ben Widawsky > > The structure exists to pass around information about register mapping. > Use it for passing @barno and @block_offset, and eliminate duplicate > local variables. > > The helpers that use @map do not care about @cxlm, so just pass them a > pdev instead. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky > Reported-by: kernel test robot Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny > [djbw: separate @base conversion] > [djbw: reorder before cxl_pci_setup_regs() refactor to improver readability] > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams > --- > Changes since v3: > - Fix a 0day report about printing a resource_size_t > > drivers/cxl/pci.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c > index 21dd10a77eb3..f1de236ccd13 100644 > --- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c > +++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c > @@ -306,12 +306,13 @@ static int cxl_pci_setup_mailbox(struct cxl_mem *cxlm) > return 0; > } > > -static void __iomem *cxl_pci_map_regblock(struct cxl_mem *cxlm, > - u8 bar, u64 offset) > +static void __iomem *cxl_pci_map_regblock(struct pci_dev *pdev, > + struct cxl_register_map *map) > { > void __iomem *addr; > - struct device *dev = cxlm->dev; > - struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev); > + int bar = map->barno; > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + resource_size_t offset = map->block_offset; > > /* Basic sanity check that BAR is big enough */ > if (pci_resource_len(pdev, bar) < offset) { > @@ -326,15 +327,15 @@ static void __iomem *cxl_pci_map_regblock(struct cxl_mem *cxlm, > return addr; > } > > - dev_dbg(dev, "Mapped CXL Memory Device resource bar %u @ %#llx\n", > - bar, offset); > + dev_dbg(dev, "Mapped CXL Memory Device resource bar %u @ %pa\n", > + bar, &offset); > > return addr; > } > > -static void cxl_pci_unmap_regblock(struct cxl_mem *cxlm, void __iomem *base) > +static void cxl_pci_unmap_regblock(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *base) > { > - pci_iounmap(to_pci_dev(cxlm->dev), base); > + pci_iounmap(pdev, base); > } > > static int cxl_pci_dvsec(struct pci_dev *pdev, int dvsec) > @@ -360,12 +361,12 @@ static int cxl_pci_dvsec(struct pci_dev *pdev, int dvsec) > return 0; > } > > -static int cxl_probe_regs(struct cxl_mem *cxlm, void __iomem *base, > +static int cxl_probe_regs(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *base, > struct cxl_register_map *map) > { > struct cxl_component_reg_map *comp_map; > struct cxl_device_reg_map *dev_map; > - struct device *dev = cxlm->dev; > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > > switch (map->reg_type) { > case CXL_REGLOC_RBI_COMPONENT: > @@ -420,12 +421,13 @@ static int cxl_map_regs(struct cxl_mem *cxlm, struct cxl_register_map *map) > return 0; > } > > -static void cxl_decode_register_block(u32 reg_lo, u32 reg_hi, > - u8 *bar, u64 *offset, u8 *reg_type) > +static void cxl_decode_regblock(u32 reg_lo, u32 reg_hi, > + struct cxl_register_map *map) > { > - *offset = ((u64)reg_hi << 32) | (reg_lo & CXL_REGLOC_ADDR_MASK); > - *bar = FIELD_GET(CXL_REGLOC_BIR_MASK, reg_lo); > - *reg_type = FIELD_GET(CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MASK, reg_lo); > + map->block_offset = > + ((u64)reg_hi << 32) | (reg_lo & CXL_REGLOC_ADDR_MASK); > + map->barno = FIELD_GET(CXL_REGLOC_BIR_MASK, reg_lo); > + map->reg_type = FIELD_GET(CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MASK, reg_lo); > } > > /** > @@ -462,34 +464,23 @@ static int cxl_pci_setup_regs(struct cxl_mem *cxlm) > > for (i = 0, n_maps = 0; i < regblocks; i++, regloc += 8) { > u32 reg_lo, reg_hi; > - u8 reg_type; > - u64 offset; > - u8 bar; > > pci_read_config_dword(pdev, regloc, ®_lo); > pci_read_config_dword(pdev, regloc + 4, ®_hi); > > - cxl_decode_register_block(reg_lo, reg_hi, &bar, &offset, > - ®_type); > + map = &maps[n_maps]; > + cxl_decode_regblock(reg_lo, reg_hi, map); > > /* Ignore unknown register block types */ > - if (reg_type > CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MEMDEV) > + if (map->reg_type > CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MEMDEV) > continue; > > - base = cxl_pci_map_regblock(cxlm, bar, offset); > + base = cxl_pci_map_regblock(pdev, map); > if (!base) > return -ENOMEM; > > - map = &maps[n_maps]; > - map->barno = bar; > - map->block_offset = offset; > - map->reg_type = reg_type; > - > - ret = cxl_probe_regs(cxlm, base + offset, map); > - > - /* Always unmap the regblock regardless of probe success */ > - cxl_pci_unmap_regblock(cxlm, base); > - > + ret = cxl_probe_regs(pdev, base + map->block_offset, map); > + cxl_pci_unmap_regblock(pdev, base); > if (ret) > return ret; > >