Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:11:55 +0300
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc:     Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: LPSS: Use ACPI_COMPANION() directly
Message-ID: <YWPVq7ebGX/xte/p@lahna>
References: <11853240.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <11853240.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 07:23:01PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> The ACPI_HANDLE() macro returns the ACPI handle of the ACPI device
> object returned by the ACPI_COMPANION() macro, so it is more
> straightforward to call the latter directly instead of passing
> the handle produced by the former to acpi_bus_get_device().
> 
> Modify the code accordingly (no intentional functional impact).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>