Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] Add Apple M1 support to PASemi i2c driver
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, Sven Peter <sven@svenpeter.dev>,
        Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Mohamed Mediouni <mohamed.mediouni@caramail.com>,
        Stan Skowronek <stan@corellium.com>,
        Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>,
        Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
        linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "R.T.Dickinson" <rtd@a-eon.com>,
        Matthew Leaman <matthew@a-eon.biz>,
        Darren Stevens <darren@stevens-zone.net>
References: <20211008163532.75569-1-sven@svenpeter.dev>
 <YWFqr4uQGlNgnT1z@ninjato> <8a8afc73-3756-a305-ce5f-70b4bce6999f@xenosoft.de>
 <11d8f784-c90a-4e6c-9abd-564cb5241cb7@www.fastmail.com>
 <YWP71c8cXlE3PcIo@kunai>
From:   Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st>
Message-ID: <5ae30425-d6d4-5688-36e3-58cc6c6ff264@marcan.st>
Date:   Mon, 11 Oct 2021 18:23:52 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <YWP71c8cXlE3PcIo@kunai>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: es-ES
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 11/10/2021 17.54, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> MAINTAINERS. It'll probably apply cleanly to 5.15-rc5 but if that happens again
> 
> It doesn't because Linus' git doesn't have:
> 
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/apple,pcie.yaml
> 
> Because MAINTAINER dependencies can be a bit nasty, I suggest I drop the
> MAINTAINER additions for now and we add them later. Then, you can add
> the pasemi-core as well. D'accord?
> 

We can just split the MAINTAINERS changes into a separate patch and I 
can push that one through the SoC tree, along with other MAINTAINERS 
updates. Does that work for everyone?

-- 
Hector Martin (marcan@marcan.st)
Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub