Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp1457629pxb; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 06:29:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxAcI9v/orrci/hLhH/r/QB3jEfra2rdqNkU+APvJSrCJmccbpET85isTFbj5eM4rWl6lg0 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:520b:: with SMTP id g11mr26461440ejm.502.1633958992253; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 06:29:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1633958992; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qBs4ck5ecXNElvWEIgrHFxIRn0B/2bgiM/Wekvu78MskX57/5rKTziZFXN+Ean0tYF pcolFLeYNVAmNj8Au/7L9vHAF2BjCLHvPAhr8Ai8FWjuYKElwm6voAko/K2xf7T8WFOA knQWYYgH7ZK9DoHyKKKsGRT+/DBzF0B7c4kAgQwm64a5LHDa8YgwTHhpR4Bs7SUL97d1 rzPrqNoNFvNAZHD8AokWmBARBO8cokcoBJ83PBX1jWwm+rqzyxjKqUJa0h6kBmiz0Zjb 2fNIQRI9zyN4kpOu3iArceSL6qsjNEpKQFHbxcT5dxyvBiq+P88TE0fgXo1OW3BJ+i8Z 8xRQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=Em+q9zk6tK9t3VAFDrqPHZpCX3hX9L7fuMzmU8FArQs=; b=d6EmzKYZPuKYN70SYkKU9H/8LnM1dEOA8wh9jpLDwGUAtzvk9jAdPPFLVDYU8EZWt9 i0rbGnSQli3nTSLEJF2fIr6n9hKbp+EFpGPGJYk9kFbakuxk0S124ezD8jFLWFBGUCpY 2eHviMbFkVBoJsvJn7zc9DE4LXvzjJqlgehljdIgLTJ8eslf88eAwGYU5Pchfmi3iF5s t7clmcogswaMcVO677Jur1/ZOz4uWhuMr31XVq6qD0Fkf5XF5bg6tY4l51yrLt/Jbn4B ujAXcOgKRDbkkX4HEhyAH4DF3jq/W4ZXEDR8/UNET1Lop0NmL7GFq+F01JyrtHTP8MxA xq7A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y16si3877688edc.470.2021.10.11.06.29.28; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 06:29:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235628AbhJKJtp (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:49:45 -0400 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:34305 "EHLO relay7-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235539AbhJKJto (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:49:44 -0400 Received: (Authenticated sender: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com) by relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BA0A20016; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:47:39 +0200 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Yang Yingliang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, a.zummo@towertech.it Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rtc: class: return error code when cdev_device_add() failed Message-ID: References: <20211011080302.1982894-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com> <20211011080302.1982894-2-yangyingliang@huawei.com> <6fcea87c-b44a-2045-9644-dce4eb968c68@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6fcea87c-b44a-2045-9644-dce4eb968c68@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/10/2021 17:40:34+0800, Yang Yingliang wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2021/10/11 16:36, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > On 11/10/2021 16:03:02+0800, Yang Yingliang wrote: > > > I got a null-ptr-deref report when doing fault injection test: > > > > > > general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000022: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI > > > KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000110-0x0000000000000117] > > > CPU: 1 PID: 1028 Comm: 33 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3-00111-gf5dad42ed4fe-dirty #481 2a70b3e6ca240b8638beac7ef491cce6183bbec7 > > > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 > > > RIP: 0010:device_del+0x132/0xdc0 > > > Code: 48 c1 ea 03 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 4f 0c 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 8b 7b 48 4d 8d a7 10 01 00 00 4c 89 e2 48 c1 ea 03 <0f> b6 04 02 84 c0 74 06 0f 8e 7f 0a 00 00 45 0f b6 b7 10 01 00 00 > > > RSP: 0018:ffffc90002e876b8 EFLAGS: 00010206 > > > RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff88801eb84000 RCX: ffffffff97227644 > > > RDX: 0000000000000022 RSI: ffff8880146a0000 RDI: 0000000000000002 > > > RBP: ffff88801eb84120 R08: fffffbfff349a60d R09: fffffbfff349a60d > > > R10: ffffc90002e876b8 R11: fffffbfff349a60c R12: 0000000000000110 > > > R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffffc90002e87848 R15: 0000000000000000 > > > FS: 00007fa514973500(0000) GS:ffff888104600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > > > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > > > CR2: 00007fa51474ccb0 CR3: 000000002bcb0001 CR4: 0000000000770ee0 > > > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > > > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > > > PKRU: 55555554 > > > Call Trace: > > > ? write_comp_data+0x2a/0x90 > > > ? cleanup_glue_dir+0x260/0x260 > > > ? is_rtc_hctosys.isra.0+0xb9/0xf0 > > > ? rtc_proc_show+0x440/0x440 > > > ? rcu_read_lock_held_common+0xe/0xa0 > > > ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x62/0xe0 > > > cdev_device_del+0x1a/0x80 > > > devm_rtc_unregister_device+0x37/0x80 > > > release_nodes+0xc3/0x3b0 > > > > > > If cdev_device_add() fails, 'dev->p' is not set, it causes > > > null-ptr-deref when calling cdev_device_del(), return error > > > code when cdev_device_add() failed to fix this. > > > > > > Reported-by: Hulk Robot > > > Fixes: 3068a254d5519 ("rtc: introduce new registration method") > > > Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang > > > --- > > > drivers/rtc/class.c | 6 ++++-- > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/class.c b/drivers/rtc/class.c > > > index 1f18c39a4b82..76422faee05b 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/rtc/class.c > > > +++ b/drivers/rtc/class.c > > > @@ -399,12 +399,14 @@ int __devm_rtc_register_device(struct module *owner, struct rtc_device *rtc) > > > rtc_dev_prepare(rtc); > > > err = cdev_device_add(&rtc->char_dev, &rtc->dev); > > > - if (err) > > > + if (err) { > > > dev_warn(rtc->dev.parent, "failed to add char device %d:%d\n", > > > MAJOR(rtc->dev.devt), rtc->id); > > > - else > > > + return err; > > As the checkpatch warning indicates, registering the character device as > > always been optional. d5ed9177f64fe95d9de79e6504d41612d9127e8a is the > > commit you want to fix. > So we can keep doing rtc register, even if cdev_device_add() failed ? > Yes, this has always been the case. -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com