Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201103194912.184413-1-jcline@redhat.com> <20201125202648.5220-1-jcline@redhat.com>
 <b4da382b17a77b66e45fd374c9d806dac6054e3a.camel@redhat.com>
 <YRoN0vWFN6Lw22ej@eldamar.lan> <418fdcbcf554d34cc6423a88974f916b64b3664c.camel@redhat.com>
 <YWPiU+9G0AKglHmi@eldamar.lan>
In-Reply-To: <YWPiU+9G0AKglHmi@eldamar.lan>
From:   Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:05:21 +0200
Message-ID: <CACO55tvokQBKz1ZyhK_2hN=V7rgV3n_L=PYNh8RLA+y8n93qRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/nouveau: fix a use-after-free in postclose()
To:     Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Cc:     Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>, Jeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com>,
        Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        nouveau <nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

I am currently checking the ML for such old patches, just have to make
sure it's actually fine and not breaking stuff as well.

But I think we will pull this in soonish, I just also work on
improving our CI stuff at the same time by trying out some things.

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 9:06 AM Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 04:32:31PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > It may have been, we're in the process of trying to change around how we
> > currently accept nouveau patches to stop this from happening in the future.
> >
> > Ben, whenever you get a moment can you take a look at this?
> >
> > On Mon, 2021-08-16 at 09:03 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:00:51PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > > > This patch series is:
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> > > >
> > > > Btw - in the future if you need to send a respin of multiple patches, you
> > > > need
> > > > to send it as it's own separate series instead of replying to the previous
> > > > one
> > > > (one-off respins can just be posted as replies though), otherwise
> > > > patchwork
> > > > won't pick it up
> > >
> > > Did this patch series somehow fall through the cracks or got lost?
>
> Looking some older threads, noticed this one. Ben did you got a chance
> to look at it, or is it now irrelevant by other means?
>
> Regards,
> Salvatore
>