Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:09:49 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To:     linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
Cc:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] mailbox: pcc: Add support for PCCT extended PCC
 subspaces
Message-ID: <20211011100949.4ck26vos5apts45e@bogus>
References: <20210917133357.1911092-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210917133357.1911092-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Jassi,

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 02:33:43PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Though the series is about adding support for PCCT extended PCC subspaces,
> except one patch, remaining are either preparatory or clean up to add
> the PCCT extended PCC subspaces. Only patch 12 adds the support of extended
> PCC type3/4 subspaces.
> 
> The main change affecting your is the change in pcc_mbox_request_channel
> to avoid clien driver using con_priv member which is designed for controller
> private pointer rather than for client's to use that.
> 

Once I have ack from Guenter, is it OK to get this merged via mailbox tree.
Rafael is happy for me to maintain this PCC part of ACPI. Do you prefer
to merge patches directly or do you prefer pull request ? Let me know.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep