Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210723204958.7186-1-tharvey@gateworks.com> <36070609-9f1f-00c8-ccf5-8ed7877b29da@pengutronix.de>
 <VI1PR04MB58533AF76EA4DFD8AD6CDA158CEC9@VI1PR04MB5853.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAJ+vNU1tgVsQWtxa0E8SArO=hA2K8OkqiSPrRSpx0Q5XS4gUWA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ+vNU1tgVsQWtxa0E8SArO=hA2K8OkqiSPrRSpx0Q5XS4gUWA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Oct 2021 07:25:34 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHCN7xLC1ob_nxRsZezgYQ9p-me7hNd+1MNFQt2wtcRqU+z9Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add IMX8M Mini PCI support
To:     Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>
Cc:     Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
        Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
        "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Krzysztof_Wilczy=C5=84ski?= <kw@linux.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 10:45 AM Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 6:28 PM Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tim:
> > Just as Ahmad mentioned, Lucas had issue one patch-set to support i.MX8MM PCIe.
> > Some comments in the review cycle.
> > - One separate PHY driver should be used for i.MX8MM PCIe driver.
> > - Schema file should be used I think, otherwise the .txt file in the dt-binding.
> >
> > I'm preparing one patch-set, but it's relied on the yaml file exchanges and power-domain changes(block control and so on).
> > Up to now, I only walking on the first step, trying to exchange the dt-binding files to schema yaml file.
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Richard Zhu
>
> Richard / Ahmad,
>
> Thanks for your response - I did not see the series from Lucas. I will
> drop this and wait for him to complete his work.
>

Tim,

It appears that the power domain changes have been applied to Shawn's
for-next branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shawnguo/linux.git/log/?h=for-next

Is there any chance you could rebase and resend this series?

thanks,

adam
> Thanks,
>
> Tim
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel