Received: by 2002:a05:6520:1682:b0:147:d1a0:b502 with SMTP id ck2csp5598328lkb; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:40:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy/KTRPmNEUXV09xfRYKbFjWzuiWPVm73YUisroo21PAbv5RxbN17FxdkCkNxy/Z47dAg5q X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:9546:: with SMTP id g6mr26710338ejy.448.1633970451691; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:40:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1633970451; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mIYSxvebtRtEmrN6dYqBKJwpiihMb3PjdVkKQuQgBgmwHnRjhojkteOPfFN7j+5lWG ZFI2qZf/AsOc8BLUlF79MfmfzRIDSpOP6VJQx5ix5qc/WfCv8gZlFjuTT+cwM6339WIL 3N5cg3K/OUxbQGZ70NExABR1SBYtzRst+lt/0v+BiJEm6P5GyXILSMES1SbvmPmU3l7K +IFb52lcNwbgH7eOIFO5f6OPO8JcMZ4t3KQvmQju7b6/XnZGQpBD6JLu869pTyg4nsrs PdLPa5O/N1Foo/QkJOP6ZO0BLtSgNJ/v0/w7G1pAR4kkG09DwB4rqQocdxsCDzcmYIgc ritg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=EjF6oCSY38v+uNIzOLmAk9N7YF4u6HHtV4W8hI+3HH8=; b=Yz1stvK5ihZEk2d+7j9tVeg00Sv6YaZd/Ot3zS0BZlTbLtotjWp9GwuBKmKkdeqkmn lEWk1H0nfjNrz2HUEKw87ZlbwOPymoXUubHpLabFKgmtmBpbiZ/dNC3AfV+KTUB0jgWq ZPHsQXgJDLu/M9C8cKDvxp7is1IgU16QvCRuxM1rh8huTeZ8YdwCpf2obmInH9/78FSM PcbkaqcPeAYePj1sQj1eD7BvJ7fVUgQnTYcaoO9HAbLvOkenCwhgj/ShD6f1Bk0PViTH j0aQxRJTp/lv+m2sL6woZWIUy06J6NUB1O2r7n2FSq3xroL1q4xpj0+quVJ1Zw9WHpk2 +ISg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=hczNldm4; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id lx24si12762210ejb.439.2021.10.11.09.40.28; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:40:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=hczNldm4; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238921AbhJKPcj (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:32:39 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53514 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239050AbhJKPcZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:32:25 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1207960FD7; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 15:30:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1633966222; bh=qNOuID3oGllggWVOJYDAs4WiOHb/u8THodubZUe5cNI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=hczNldm4ilpy5d2rw7/HQI8YQAhwNVL4gxmrXW2HE94gT4bhv2wJer70mM10kRLUc TQyXBvbWz4CnRB4ZEFc8h5YTCBmI4AUc4vx2ZzsaCQyo/8SGlE9PRc65NZWVKZz5XQ h9E4qi8yxZR9a8cgnAmjvanRDtGgzCLKGG6XJHXo= Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 17:30:19 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: "Hunter, Adrian" Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , Bart Van Assche , "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 83/83] scsi: ufs: core: Fix task management completion Message-ID: References: <20211011134508.362906295@linuxfoundation.org> <20211011134511.235071707@linuxfoundation.org> <8dc0e077af3f4fd5a0887784f65bd722@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8dc0e077af3f4fd5a0887784f65bd722@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 03:03:59PM +0000, Hunter, Adrian wrote: > Hi > > This doesn't work. Please drop. Sorry, no idea why I sent it before testing. > > Specifically, in v5.10, ufshcd_tmc_handler() can be called under the same spinlock > it is using, which deadlocks. Ok, now dropped! thanks, greg k-h