Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp2320292pxb; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 04:14:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyDSI6X2FZVoOo5ACb5l6fmOloZ0Wjsmg2jUIBg2xyx+mIyZCYHBD9jfYxpXLh2hcYjS6Rw X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:34d0:: with SMTP id w16mr41940607edc.98.1634037254947; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 04:14:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634037254; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Qd2BywYC7wkKXIVOqeYJ8dwa6K8nKLqpuZGtRgLQj8CXk9Oc1eZnRetAR3zz1qmr1M Ap4uUHFlBI4osovKAxP1rp0+z0MjDXjaTmy7P/35ifzwVVve+f6e6il+Gmbe6cNXD8d9 7gzgvUjLLG1FLSC9tg2KEOW9k5RxtxrFl6qmm3oXfxNBAeP6cVP/TbmmQy9IyU/NmK4p pqzA5MFIsc+SYKb65G2oEqwlCjY+uPJNDVEEoBrkES08RUyuys9zA3FDpb6rFt9OBTjh tEnV5Mvm8UzXZzSnJd61lUgvjj9uGJjJbhxvbsoCFvv3yt9noH+hCQZRoSf3ocH9xaPz 71UA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:organization :from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=A4tr+WT1IxgZxfPSMgT77kTtr4zb6xglyk4OS2F3Jl0=; b=ftsj6ZcMMb55T9UglR+wc7hZ2HwZQPmLTkyvfVqhjCGr2s/07nNmcdCEZtzwOdxzb+ lYxDVA+g8hncFaRMZvkg2NtpAaSxspgos2id+EgQLku1PgoDWU4pHDVFQB6atvLgQ9Ol LZ7H8NAYe3GvN3sSrurQHxtQfxT7nQY2UDCSZhqk6/WkEh9EYvBbzzWmvixPfTOQ33JJ 5ULXpcmdfR3EdhaZVQsGm/c/CHAvgUmxvg5cnZNB/1UNu2KnBuqxnLErBts/ujbPAeFf OSbRGAifAAUWXHFH9mOS/9GeT8Lly+Xe2NRizyvuOaGKUIfj2sU5cgh6sFqgxAwub9gt G/BA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=U6PCpweP; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u14si5873859eds.382.2021.10.12.04.13.50; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 04:14:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=U6PCpweP; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233324AbhJLLLe (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 07:11:34 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:30030 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236004AbhJLLLd (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 07:11:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1634036971; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=A4tr+WT1IxgZxfPSMgT77kTtr4zb6xglyk4OS2F3Jl0=; b=U6PCpwePlMj9vVRkz4zszyay/Y4GV8kyR5/C61F/GjVCRp3vbM78WjLc43jgpesD//XZMK lb7fssI1Z5+cbCGMGW9QrY3L/rEPcna7ph5zuPYtxJOUWCyOE10bHCeN2acIvpZSfrOaj0 N2yqFwukx2zvTQmgwdWHAZpH4Ghiz1c= Received: from mail-wr1-f70.google.com (mail-wr1-f70.google.com [209.85.221.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-313-SM0MPAUEMq2thOOZrJuCgw-1; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 07:09:30 -0400 X-MC-Unique: SM0MPAUEMq2thOOZrJuCgw-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f70.google.com with SMTP id k2-20020adfc702000000b0016006b2da9bso15434340wrg.1 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 04:09:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=A4tr+WT1IxgZxfPSMgT77kTtr4zb6xglyk4OS2F3Jl0=; b=VPdJL5maErMaflXbfSCRn2bmiz4Iq5mtZrBGebrRgrFouB5u6sbMHZHtKQSGTWJFwl ShNl7cghMBLHJIPCyyzPxb98rX1Q1Ve4pzR/IHn3+/6Z9lZdadYJNz6rWSKgLQz1CtcP 8ng4+4+l4peAVdETuV2inE8K466f/8gyxngYwsl8nlgmvVFzGAWlJXE6+BBtHKC8bB8U Mb+mXQT3g7+k7yL+98W6yQPjSbycQhPMz5ivwnAwayaOLnsaiP8HWE9f0jwKpnkLEYTy 172Rq65uu3ZnQ1fWW8vuvUKQYKw+tjm8e5KmdMCSSrHtmE9xJsqHip3lLV4aiWWDwqYt qcqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533CRumkE5OmAMGJfTCWi3tk2thxYC4BDXj2wuvhar7CEXNqrIKn yKkkpmb1Y1K0kPfEwxzwiQ6pwqVucmw6/bRCpgAhb5bwHVBWIaYwiY10AS9H9lX0ffJtvRTcyiQ gynCX+/kuKi0Q1721MA5hWisv X-Received: by 2002:adf:f243:: with SMTP id b3mr27633248wrp.60.1634036969029; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 04:09:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:adf:f243:: with SMTP id b3mr27633215wrp.60.1634036968803; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 04:09:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.3.132] (p5b0c6a12.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [91.12.106.18]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l20sm3150399wmq.42.2021.10.12.04.09.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 04:09:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH memcg] mm/page_alloc.c: avoid statistic update with 0 To: Vasily Averin , Vlastimil Babka , Michal Hocko Cc: Johannes Weiner , Vladimir Davydov , Andrew Morton , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@openvz.org, Mel Gorman , Uladzislau Rezki References: <29155011-f884-b0e5-218e-911039568acb@suse.cz> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat Message-ID: <0a707990-f12c-3c60-2a96-e1d531e100a6@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 13:09:27 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12.10.21 12:42, Vasily Averin wrote: > On 08.10.2021 14:47, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> On 10/8/21 11:24, Vasily Averin wrote: >>> __alloc_pages_bulk can call __count_zid_vm_events and zone_statistics >>> with nr_account = 0. >> >> But that's not a bug, right? Just an effective no-op that's not commonly >> happening, so is it worth the check? > > Why not? > > Yes, it's not a bug, it just makes the kernel a bit more efficient in a very unlikely case. > However, it looks strange and makes uninformed code reviewers like me worry about possible > problems inside the affected functions. No one else calls these functions from 0. > If it's not a BUG we'd better leave "Fixes:" tags away., it tends to confuse people looking for actual BUGs. I'm also not sure if this micro-optimization is worth it. "bit more efficient in a very unlikely case" doesn't sound very compelling ... and personally I'd assume accounting functions can deal with a delta of 0. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb