Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:18:42 +0200
From:   Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] s390: DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALL support
Message-ID: <YWXDcoQEVm1uCCEP@osiris>
References: <20211012133802.2460757-1-hca@linux.ibm.com>
 <20211012094852.7f6a59b8@gandalf.local.home>
 <YWWithSCGThguq7s@osiris>
 <20211012113404.29ac7c9c@gandalf.local.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20211012113404.29ac7c9c@gandalf.local.home>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:34:04AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:59:02 +0200
> Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > One thing to note: Jiri adds a new a sample module, which obviously
> > will not compile for s390. Not sure if the config mechanism I propose
> > with this patch set is the best way to address this - it would then
> > require to add a config option for each new sample module.
> 
> Is that really an issue?
> 
> We could just group them, as long as they have the same prefix.
> 
> HAVE_SAMPLE_FTRACE_DIRECT
> HAVE_SAMPLE_FTRACE_MULTI_DIRECT

Sure, works for me. I just thought I should mention this.