Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp2657500pxb; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 10:46:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxkyiwpgkj5PgK9WUsWWC+F8DUangfDS8F7RAut6eMLKOuur8wkIm3RN+1Q6hObnfqKbeM9 X-Received: by 2002:a50:da0a:: with SMTP id z10mr1517551edj.95.1634060766343; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 10:46:06 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634060766; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DpIsTc5SW/W+XbZXoCnyKnS1N1rbFgv/jBqOoIIHn5KT6ZijwT/ocSDsnHuhjVmeAj 2L5VTZ64lT9UvScfWbn/JMr8NRXFHg4Fk3EV9XFDn68Ergf2Um7ZBO6yskE2lOJKUfir +VeUEqbaAQWk1sE47k6aKylHNjTXaDwMNeH5KnEZOr57EFC6jEnI7ERQlZaQSNDlXKtR MmWsnxBDohKXqHbxb8w0B84WM3ybLllE++02HG9MEvfCRguKUAxXlYDi02GMTF0KheJM Wc1otXxaFGWmfbbgUHjPd2aS/GnCD0+Y5iHAIUQOqAK220ZNrQTRsVzqGqc7fMhclK0L 7L6g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id; bh=R1L39TCW00S7WYOdR2y/HxdYe23A1IlcVFf506fT5Gs=; b=oeT9CkAc+1+d2o543cU2pTxpjKKqfu9y0Kb8umlDdkMabDrjh6pRhqXIWFrCDWm6fL yFql9soT5Qb8jJsozvBZ0hS5gHgfkL1p1kpIp6fkxHkninN4+TF5gIoVJhMN0xf4s/b1 dRv8IZZd3VOqfTgzl62L7/hcl3sW69vV6h16UjqOb36+vrvuVcSzFCfVD3obzETc9fN1 Ki5D6+YZfUdi/z2czzegDElLm2+nugCoOyBpGO/4bGvV1KDoP0X6+TEZQBGo7Obp1z7D X4pAlAZ+8FVT00wG4WpYUBLoqAZQWCEqrqhQXp3ybHUyeEnasNehG9AIVt+lUT/QUtl+ 9q4Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id di4si22352555ejc.505.2021.10.12.10.45.41; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 10:46:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232684AbhJLRp3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 13:45:29 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0034.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.34]:38512 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231945AbhJLRp2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 13:45:28 -0400 Received: from omf11.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F267B182CF669; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 17:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf11.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D433120A29E; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 17:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <61c28865036cd40a96f2d1bb4c27fbbb08c2d3a5.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: buffer: Fix double-free in iio_buffers_alloc_sysfs_and_mask() From: Joe Perches To: Andy Shevchenko , Alexandru Ardelean Cc: Yang Yingliang , LKML , linux-iio , Lars-Peter Clausen , Jonathan Cameron Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 10:43:23 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <20211012092513.1349295-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.0-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.07 X-Stat-Signature: z9zzireukwma57cfoj7sp1d5aw93oafd X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D433120A29E X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX1+7/cZM/LWiim6mvI2uBZUhz4Od5CT6vMA= X-HE-Tag: 1634060604-209060 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2021-10-12 at 23:30 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 2:37 PM Alexandru Ardelean > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 12:18 PM Yang Yingliang > > wrote: > > > > > > When __iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask() failed, 'unwind_idx' should be > > > set to 'i - 1' to prevent double-free when cleanup resources. [] > > I prefer to see > > - for (; unwind_idx >= 0; unwind_idx--) { > + while (unwind_idx--) Not the same code as unwind_idx would be decremented before entering the code block. You'd want do { ... } while (unwind_idx--);